From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:18:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051111201849.GP5376@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051110182443.514622ed.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:24:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:28:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currently, using an undeclared function gives a compile warning, but it
> > > > can lead to a nasty runtime error if the prototype of the function is
> > > > different from what gcc guessed.
> > > >
> > > > With -Werror-implicit-function-declaration, we are getting an immediate
> > > > compile error instead.
> > > >
> > > > There will be some compile errors in cases where compilation previously
> > > > worked because the undefined function wasn't called due to gcc dead code
> > > > elimination, but in these cases a proper fix doesnt harm.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I need to build allmodconfig kernels on wacky architectures (eg
> > > ppc64) and this patch is killing me.
> >
> > Can you send me the list of compile errors so that I can work on fixing
> > them?
> >
>
> No handily, sorry. Missing virt_to_bus() is the typical problem.
>
But in this case -Werror-implicit-function-declaration doesn't create
new compile errors, it only moves compile errors from compile time to
link or depmod time - which is IMHO not a bad change.
If you really want to keep the status quo, you can still steal the
following from sparc64:
extern unsigned long virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
#define virt_to_bus virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map
extern unsigned long bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
#define bus_to_virt bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map
Would a patch to mark the ISA legacy functions as __deprecated be OK?
This might give some motivation for people to convert drivers and would
avoid new code like the recently introduced kexec to use this obsolete
API.
> The cross-tools at http://developer.osdl.org/dev/plm/cross_compile/ are
> quite simple to install.
Thanks, I've tried it.
Other problems I found until I gave up on compiling:
- a problem in sk98lin indirectly corrected by my SkPciWriteCfgDWord()
patch
- drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/: missing #include <linux/vmalloc.h>'s
(see my patch) - this seems to be a real bug
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 20:03 [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 12:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 3:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-11 20:18 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-11-11 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 4:52 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 4:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 13:48 ` Al Viro
2005-11-12 13:48 ` Al Viro
2005-11-16 3:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-16 3:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-12 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-12 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-12 4:34 ` [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 21:24 ` [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-12 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-07 17:10 Luck, Tony
2006-07-07 17:10 ` Luck, Tony
2006-07-06 16:37 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 18:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-06 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-07 3:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 5:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-07 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:53 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-07 7:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-07 9:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-06-28 16:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:34 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-24 0:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 14:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:18 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:38 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 16:52 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-30 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-30 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-30 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051111201849.GP5376@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.