From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:20:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060706182041.GF13168@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060706163728.GN26941@stusta.de>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:37:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Currently, using an undeclared function gives a compile warning, but it
> can lead to a nasty to debug runtime stack corruptions if the prototype
> of the function is different from what gcc guessed.
>
> With -Werror-implicit-function-declaration we are getting an immediate
> compile error instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
I've been carrying pretty much the same patch in Fedora for months,
and making sure it still builds across x86/x86-64/s390/ia64/ppc32/ppc64.
It saves a lot of time when you're building a large heavily modular kernel.
(like that from a distro config say)
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-06 16:37 [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 18:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-06 18:20 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-07-07 3:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 5:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-07 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:53 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-07 7:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-07 9:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-07 17:10 Luck, Tony
2006-07-07 17:10 ` Luck, Tony
2006-06-28 16:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:34 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-24 0:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 20:03 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 12:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 3:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-11 20:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-12 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 14:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:18 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:38 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 16:52 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-30 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-30 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-30 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060706182041.GF13168@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.