All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: christoph@lameter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH] slab: consolidate allocation paths
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:00:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060204180026.b68e9476.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139070779.21489.5.camel@localhost>

This consolidation patch looks ok to me on first read, though others
are certainly more expert in this code than I am.  Certainly cleanup,
ifdef reduction and consolidation of mm/slab.c is a worthwhile goal.
That code is rough for folks like me to follow.

Two issues I can see:

  1) This patch increased the text size of mm/slab.o by 776
     bytes (ia64 sn2_defconfig gcc 3.3.3), which should be
     justified.  My naive expectation would have been that
     such a source code consolidation patch would be text
     size neutral, or close to it.

  2) You might want to hold off this patch for a few days,
     until the dust settles from my memory spread patch.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: christoph@lameter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH] slab: consolidate allocation paths
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:00:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060204180026.b68e9476.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139070779.21489.5.camel@localhost>

This consolidation patch looks ok to me on first read, though others
are certainly more expert in this code than I am.  Certainly cleanup,
ifdef reduction and consolidation of mm/slab.c is a worthwhile goal.
That code is rough for folks like me to follow.

Two issues I can see:

  1) This patch increased the text size of mm/slab.o by 776
     bytes (ia64 sn2_defconfig gcc 3.3.3), which should be
     justified.  My naive expectation would have been that
     such a source code consolidation patch would be text
     size neutral, or close to it.

  2) You might want to hold off this patch for a few days,
     until the dust settles from my memory spread patch.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-05  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-04 13:33 [RFT/PATCH] slab: consolidate allocation paths Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 13:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-04 15:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-04 16:26   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 16:26     ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 16:32     ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 16:32       ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05  2:00       ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-02-05  2:00         ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05  3:44         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-05  3:44           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-05  4:36           ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05  4:36             ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05  8:41         ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05  8:41           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05  9:18           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05  9:18             ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05 12:29         ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-05 12:29           ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060204180026.b68e9476.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=christoph@lameter.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.