All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_route_input panic fix
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:53:17 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060418.205317.18564378.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060418235222.GA20504@ms2.inr.ac.ru>

From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:52:22 +0400

> Actually, this weird case in inet_get_route() is the only place, where
> a dummy skb is used and it is needed mostly to resolve multicast routes.
> In this case this fake skb really passes through all the engine, even
> delivered to user space in some sense, and when the route is resolved,
> the same skb is submitted to netlink socket. I remember, Dave found
> something very bad about this and this even deserved a place in TODO list,
> but franky speaking I did not understand what is so wrong with this trick.

Problem there is via rt_fill_info().  When multicast route cannot be
found by ipmr, it tries to use this netlink SKB to send out a probe.

ipmr_get_route() is the trouble maker.  If ipmr_cache_find() cannot
find an entry, it tries to use the netlink SKB to send out an ipv4
packet, completely mangling it, via ipmr_cache_unresolved().

Even worse it may even free the skb on us, or queue it to
mroute_socket.

It is pure disaster, this entire code path.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-19  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-18  0:12 [PATCH] ip_route_input panic fix Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-18  2:28 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-18  2:49   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-18  2:54     ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-18  5:45   ` David S. Miller
2006-04-18  6:54 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-18 21:54   ` David S. Miller
2006-04-18 22:08     ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-18 23:52   ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-04-19  0:17     ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-19  3:53     ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-04-19  9:46       ` Alexey Kuznetsov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-19  0:59 Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-04-19  1:00 Alexey Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060418.205317.18564378.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.