Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix console handling during suspend/resume

[David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>]

On Thursday 15 June 2006 9:52 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Čt 15-06-06 09:43:04, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 June 2006 1:39 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Actually it would be interesting to hear counter-arguments to this
> > > > position:
> > > > 
> > > > 	We already HAVE that two-phase thing going on, at
> > > > 	least for swsusp.  In phase I a PM_EVENT_FREEZE
> > > > 	gets sent.  Then in phase II a PM_EVENT_SUSPEND gets
> > > > 	tries to really suspend things.
> > > > 
> > > > One counter-argument might be that "phase I.5 resumes those devices"
> > > > is a problem.  Another might be that "FREEZE should not be sent to
> > > > the console(s), the swap device, or their parents".  I suspect there
> > > > are a few more issues mixed up in there too.
> > > 
> > > This is FAQ:
> > 
> > Which seems to suggest that you are Frequently giving a useless
> > Answer to the Question ... and in this case, not the question
> > which was asked.  
> 
> Okay, so what is the question you are asking?

What you quoted above was the topic ... not precisely a question,
more of a "compare and contrast" what we have today with what Linus
was talking about.

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm