Re: bus.suspend_prepare()

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

On Wed 2006-07-26 08:24:11, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 05:17, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 11:29 am, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > Hmm ... I just noticed that the swsusp code path (PM_SUSPEND_DISK)
> > > > is ignoring the new suspend_prepare() mechanism.
> > > >
> > > > That doesn't seem like a good thing ... Linus, is there a reason you
> > > > did it that way?
> > >
> > > Just because I found that neither interesting nor testable in my
> > > environment.
> >
> > Yeah, testable is an issue.  Maybe a better fix would be to remove
> > the bus.suspend_prepare() operation for now.  Someone with real use
> > cases could easily add a complete working package that includes that
> > mechanism plus some testable code that needs it.
> 
> Not knowing anything about the actual details of the problem, I wonder if 
> these new calls would help with that acpi issue where it tries to allocate 
> memory with GFP_KERNEL during drivers suspend. Would it be helpful

No, ACPI runs its code very early, and it can not be preallocated.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html