All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:08:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822140832.GW11651@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44EAFEE3.8080700@goop.org>

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:56:03AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>relicensing them.
> >>    
> >
> >That's a pretty strong statement...
> >  
> 
> Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement.  I'm just pointing out 
> that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional 
> change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops).  Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops 
> is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive.

It only affects kernels with the new functionality PARAVIRT=y, not 
kernels with the same functionality as today.

The alternative is to keep the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) and make 
the functions using it out of line functions.

>    J

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:08:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822140832.GW11651@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44EAFEE3.8080700@goop.org>

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:56:03AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>relicensing them.
> >>    
> >
> >That's a pretty strong statement...
> >  
> 
> Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement.  I'm just pointing out 
> that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional 
> change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops).  Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops 
> is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive.

It only affects kernels with the new functionality PARAVIRT=y, not 
kernels with the same functionality as today.

The alternative is to keep the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) and make 
the functions using it out of line functions.

>    J

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-22 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-10  9:35 [PATCH] paravirt.h Rusty Russell
2006-08-10 10:10 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-10 10:30   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 11:05     ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-10 11:31       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 11:31         ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 13:03         ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-10 15:14       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
     [not found]         ` <44DB54A5.50006@vmware.com>
     [not found]           ` <44DB6144.2080308@goop.org>
     [not found]             ` <1155262867.27719.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-08-11  2:34               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-10 18:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-19  1:21   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-19  2:46     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-19  2:46       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-20  8:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-08-22 12:56         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-22 14:08           ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-08-22 14:08             ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-22 13:56   ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 13:56     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 13:44     ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 17:16       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 18:29         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 19:30           ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 19:17             ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 19:26               ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 19:29                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 19:43                   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 19:43                     ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 20:16                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 22:02                   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  1:55                     ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-23  1:55                       ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-23  2:12                       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  7:56                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-23  8:44                       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  8:50                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  9:01                           ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  9:06                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  9:14                               ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  9:20                                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  9:36                                   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  9:41                                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  9:48                                       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23  9:50                                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 10:03                                           ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23 10:03                                             ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-23 11:24                                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  8:56                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-23  8:18                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  8:18                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23  8:38                       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 21:36               ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 13:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 13:50       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 14:25         ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-22 14:25           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-22 14:54           ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 17:36             ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-22 18:35               ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 18:35                 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 14:59     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-22 15:12       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 15:12         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 15:58       ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 15:58         ` Alan Cox
2006-08-23  1:35     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060822140832.GW11651@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.