From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Put the BUG __FILE__ and __LINE__ info out of line
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:18:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060928091809.0253ce4f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451BA380.7030502@goop.org>
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:27:12 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Plan #17 is to just put the BUG inline and then put the EIP+file*+line into
> > a separate section, then search that section at BUG time to find the record
> > whose EIP points back at this ud2a.
> >
>
> Sure, but it seems a bit complex for this; I think simpler is better
> when the kernel has got itself into an iffy state.
It's just a linear search.
> > It's a bit messy for modules, but it minimises the .text impact and keeps
> > disassembly happy, no?
> >
> I'm not quite sure I understand your concern. You're worried about the
> size increase to vmlinux in the case where you specify
> CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE?
- We're using ten bytes of instruction cache where we could use two bytes
- If this is done right, other architectures can use the look-it-up code,
thus cleaning up the kernel codebase.
And looky, powerpc already does this, so it'd be a matter of librarifying
their code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-28 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-28 6:00 [PATCH] Put the BUG __FILE__ and __LINE__ info out of line Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-28 6:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 6:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-28 7:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 7:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-28 7:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 10:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-28 10:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-28 10:38 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-28 15:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-09-28 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-28 10:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-28 16:18 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-09-28 16:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-28 7:16 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060928091809.0253ce4f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.