All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 04/10] Task watchers v2 Register semundo task watcher
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:02:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929021300.586272000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060929020232.756637000@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-semundo --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5481 bytes --]

Make the semaphore undo code use a task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/sem.h |   17 -----------------
 ipc/sem.c           |   12 ++++++++----
 kernel/exit.c       |    1 -
 kernel/fork.c       |    6 +-----
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/ipc/sem.c
@@ -81,10 +81,11 @@
 #include <linux/audit.h>
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "util.h"
 
 #define sem_ids(ns)	(*((ns)->ids[IPC_SEM_IDS]))
@@ -1286,11 +1287,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, st
  * See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
  * in this code.  Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
  * because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
  */
 
-int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	int error;
 
 	if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
@@ -1302,10 +1303,11 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
 	} else 
 		tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
 
 	return 0;
 }
+task_watcher_func(init, copy_semundo);
 
 /*
  * add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
  * undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
  * so some of them may be out of date.
@@ -1315,22 +1317,22 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
  * should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
  * The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
  * The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
  * and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
  */
-void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int exit_sem(unsigned long ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	struct sem_undo *u, **up;
 	struct ipc_namespace *ns;
 
 	undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
 	if (!undo_list)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
 	/* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
          * is the last task exiting for this undo list.
 	 */
@@ -1393,11 +1395,13 @@ found:
 		update_queue(sma);
 next_entry:
 		sem_unlock(sma);
 	}
 	kfree(undo_list);
+	return 0;
 }
+task_watcher_func(free, exit_sem);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
 {
 	struct sem_array *sma = it;
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
@@ -915,11 +915,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 	exit_mm(tsk);
 	notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, code, tsk);
 
 	if (group_dead)
 		acct_process();
-	exit_sem(tsk);
 	__exit_files(tsk);
 	__exit_fs(tsk);
 	exit_thread();
 	cpuset_exit(tsk);
 	exit_keys(tsk);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1103,14 +1103,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 #endif
 
 	if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
 	/* copy all the process information */
-	if ((retval = copy_semundo(clone_flags, p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_semundo;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
 	if ((retval = copy_sighand(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_fs;
 	if ((retval = copy_signal(clone_flags, p)))
@@ -1277,12 +1275,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
 	__cleanup_sighand(p->sighand);
 bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
-bad_fork_cleanup_semundo:
-	exit_sem(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/include/linux/sem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/include/linux/sem.h
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -136,25 +136,8 @@ struct sem_undo_list {
 
 struct sysv_sem {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
-
-extern int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk);
-extern void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
-
-#else
-static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return;
-}
-#endif
-
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_SEM_H */

--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 04/10] Task watchers v2 Register semundo task watcher
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:02:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929021300.586272000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060929020232.756637000@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-semundo --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5131 bytes --]

Make the semaphore undo code use a task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/sem.h |   17 -----------------
 ipc/sem.c           |   12 ++++++++----
 kernel/exit.c       |    1 -
 kernel/fork.c       |    6 +-----
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/ipc/sem.c
@@ -81,10 +81,11 @@
 #include <linux/audit.h>
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "util.h"
 
 #define sem_ids(ns)	(*((ns)->ids[IPC_SEM_IDS]))
@@ -1286,11 +1287,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, st
  * See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
  * in this code.  Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
  * because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
  */
 
-int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	int error;
 
 	if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
@@ -1302,10 +1303,11 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
 	} else 
 		tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
 
 	return 0;
 }
+task_watcher_func(init, copy_semundo);
 
 /*
  * add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
  * undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
  * so some of them may be out of date.
@@ -1315,22 +1317,22 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
  * should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
  * The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
  * The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
  * and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
  */
-void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int exit_sem(unsigned long ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	struct sem_undo *u, **up;
 	struct ipc_namespace *ns;
 
 	undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
 	if (!undo_list)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
 	/* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
          * is the last task exiting for this undo list.
 	 */
@@ -1393,11 +1395,13 @@ found:
 		update_queue(sma);
 next_entry:
 		sem_unlock(sma);
 	}
 	kfree(undo_list);
+	return 0;
 }
+task_watcher_func(free, exit_sem);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
 {
 	struct sem_array *sma = it;
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
@@ -915,11 +915,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 	exit_mm(tsk);
 	notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, code, tsk);
 
 	if (group_dead)
 		acct_process();
-	exit_sem(tsk);
 	__exit_files(tsk);
 	__exit_fs(tsk);
 	exit_thread();
 	cpuset_exit(tsk);
 	exit_keys(tsk);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1103,14 +1103,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 #endif
 
 	if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
 	/* copy all the process information */
-	if ((retval = copy_semundo(clone_flags, p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_semundo;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
 	if ((retval = copy_sighand(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_fs;
 	if ((retval = copy_signal(clone_flags, p)))
@@ -1277,12 +1275,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
 	__cleanup_sighand(p->sighand);
 bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
-bad_fork_cleanup_semundo:
-	exit_sem(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/include/linux/sem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/include/linux/sem.h
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -136,25 +136,8 @@ struct sem_undo_list {
 
 struct sysv_sem {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
-
-extern int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk);
-extern void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
-
-#else
-static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return;
-}
-#endif
-
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_SEM_H */

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-29  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-29  2:02 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] Task watchers v2 Task watchers v2 Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:32   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:32     ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29 19:38     ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 20:13       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29 20:13         ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-30  0:01         ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-30  0:01           ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-09-30  0:04           ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-30  0:04             ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] Task watchers v2 Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2006-09-29  2:02   ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] Task watchers v2 Register semundo " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] Task watchers v2 Register cpuset " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:31   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:31     ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  7:52     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  8:03       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  8:03         ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] Task watchers v2 Register NUMA mempolicy " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] Task watchers v2 Register IRQ flag tracing " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] Task watchers v2 Register lockdep " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] Task watchers v2 Register process keyrings " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] Task watchers v2 Register process events connector Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:41   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  8:16   ` [RFC][PATCH] Task watchers and modules (WAS Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction) Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 16:22   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Menage
2006-09-29 16:22     ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060929021300.586272000@us.ibm.com \
    --to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.