All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] Task watchers v2 Register NUMA mempolicy task watcher
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:02:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929021301.134993000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060929020232.756637000@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-numa-mempolicy --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4126 bytes --]

Register a NUMA mempolicy task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/exit.c  |    4 ----
 kernel/fork.c  |   15 +--------------
 mm/mempolicy.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -87,10 +87,11 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/migrate.h>
 #include <linux/rmap.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 /* Internal flags */
@@ -1331,10 +1332,33 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_copy(struct mem
 		}
 	}
 	return new;
 }
 
+static int init_task_mempolicy(unsigned long clone_flags,
+			       struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ 	tsk->mempolicy = mpol_copy(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(tsk->mempolicy)) {
+		int retval;
+
+ 		retval = PTR_ERR(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 		tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+		return retval;
+ 	}
+	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(tsk);
+	return 0;
+}
+task_watcher_func(init, init_task_mempolicy);
+
+static int free_task_mempolicy(unsigned int ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	mpol_free(tsk);
+	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+}
+task_watcher_func(free, free_task_mempolicy);
+
 /* Slow path of a mempolicy comparison */
 int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
 {
 	if (!a || !b)
 		return 0;
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1058,19 +1058,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 		p->tgid = current->tgid;
 
 	retval = notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_INIT, clone_flags, p);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- 	p->mempolicy = mpol_copy(p->mempolicy);
- 	if (IS_ERR(p->mempolicy)) {
- 		retval = PTR_ERR(p->mempolicy);
- 		p->mempolicy = NULL;
- 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
- 	}
-	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(p);
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	p->irq_events = 0;
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 	p->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
 #else
@@ -1099,11 +1090,11 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
 	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
 #endif
 
 	if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
 	/* copy all the process information */
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
@@ -1275,14 +1266,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
-bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
-#endif
 bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt:
 	delayacct_tsk_free(p);
 	notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, 0, p);
 	if (p->binfmt)
 		module_put(p->binfmt->module);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
@@ -930,14 +930,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 
 	tsk->exit_code = code;
 	proc_exit_connector(tsk);
 	exit_notify(tsk);
 	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(tsk->mempolicy);
-	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
-#endif
 	/*
 	 * This must happen late, after the PID is not
 	 * hashed anymore:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&tsk->pi_state_list)))

--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] Task watchers v2 Register NUMA mempolicy task watcher
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:02:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929021301.134993000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060929020232.756637000@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-numa-mempolicy --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3776 bytes --]

Register a NUMA mempolicy task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/exit.c  |    4 ----
 kernel/fork.c  |   15 +--------------
 mm/mempolicy.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -87,10 +87,11 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/migrate.h>
 #include <linux/rmap.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 /* Internal flags */
@@ -1331,10 +1332,33 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_copy(struct mem
 		}
 	}
 	return new;
 }
 
+static int init_task_mempolicy(unsigned long clone_flags,
+			       struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ 	tsk->mempolicy = mpol_copy(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(tsk->mempolicy)) {
+		int retval;
+
+ 		retval = PTR_ERR(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 		tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+		return retval;
+ 	}
+	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(tsk);
+	return 0;
+}
+task_watcher_func(init, init_task_mempolicy);
+
+static int free_task_mempolicy(unsigned int ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	mpol_free(tsk);
+	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+}
+task_watcher_func(free, free_task_mempolicy);
+
 /* Slow path of a mempolicy comparison */
 int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
 {
 	if (!a || !b)
 		return 0;
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1058,19 +1058,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 		p->tgid = current->tgid;
 
 	retval = notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_INIT, clone_flags, p);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- 	p->mempolicy = mpol_copy(p->mempolicy);
- 	if (IS_ERR(p->mempolicy)) {
- 		retval = PTR_ERR(p->mempolicy);
- 		p->mempolicy = NULL;
- 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
- 	}
-	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(p);
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	p->irq_events = 0;
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 	p->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
 #else
@@ -1099,11 +1090,11 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
 	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
 #endif
 
 	if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
 	/* copy all the process information */
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
@@ -1275,14 +1266,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
-bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
-#endif
 bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt:
 	delayacct_tsk_free(p);
 	notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, 0, p);
 	if (p->binfmt)
 		module_put(p->binfmt->module);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
@@ -930,14 +930,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 
 	tsk->exit_code = code;
 	proc_exit_connector(tsk);
 	exit_notify(tsk);
 	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(tsk->mempolicy);
-	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
-#endif
 	/*
 	 * This must happen late, after the PID is not
 	 * hashed anymore:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&tsk->pi_state_list)))

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-29  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-29  2:02 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] Task watchers v2 Task watchers v2 Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:32   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:32     ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29 19:38     ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 20:13       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29 20:13         ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-30  0:01         ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-30  0:01           ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-09-30  0:04           ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-30  0:04             ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] Task watchers v2 Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] Task watchers v2 Register semundo " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] Task watchers v2 Register cpuset " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:31   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:31     ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  7:52     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  8:03       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  8:03         ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2006-09-29  2:02   ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] Task watchers v2 Register NUMA mempolicy " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] Task watchers v2 Register IRQ flag tracing " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] Task watchers v2 Register lockdep " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] Task watchers v2 Register process keyrings " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] Task watchers v2 Register process events connector Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02   ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:41   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  8:16   ` [RFC][PATCH] Task watchers and modules (WAS Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction) Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 16:22   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Menage
2006-09-29 16:22     ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060929021301.134993000@us.ibm.com \
    --to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.