All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blueswir1@hotmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question?
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:11:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610141511.57566.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F24607558F45198104EAFD2FF0B0@phx.gbl>

On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:14, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >There's no such think as an Ideal cpu. It's like picking the right
> >religion :-) If you want a toy cpu, there are things like mmix.
>
> In general true. But the real and toy CPUs are designed with the hardware
> construction in mind, whereas the limitations deriving from HW (number of
> registers, number of instructions, instruction complexity) may be less
> relevant in the Qemu case. Also Qemu could benefit from getting information
> analysed from the source code that no real HW needs. For example, perhaps
> the TB state could be managed explicitly by the compiler.

There are plenty of pre-existing dynamic compilation targets, pretty much all 
of which have JIT compilers. eg. JVM, CIL and parrot. IMHO qemu probably 
isn't a particularly good base for this sort of thing, as it's more oriented 
towards emulating conventional CPUs.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-14 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-10 16:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question? Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 17:55 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-10 18:59   ` WaxDragon
2006-10-10 19:10     ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 20:34 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-10 20:44   ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 22:00     ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11  2:39     ` Paul Brook
2006-10-11 12:05       ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-11 17:20       ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 17:32         ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-11 17:32         ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 18:04           ` Brian Wheeler
2006-10-11 19:28         ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-10-11 19:38           ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 20:02           ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-13 22:31         ` Paul Brook
2006-10-14  8:14           ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-14 14:11             ` Paul Brook [this message]
2006-10-10 23:51 ` Aurelien Jarno
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 21:03 Ben Taylor
2006-10-11 22:38 ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610141511.57566.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=blueswir1@hotmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.