From: "K. Richard Pixley" <rich.pixley@palmsource.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:32:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452D2AA5.4000404@palmsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F78187B88633A12B4AF4E0FF140@phx.gbl>
Blue Swirl wrote:
> BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
> purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with
> zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler
> for the CPU, also porting some OS to it. Any GCC and Linux guru
> volunteers? CS research projects?
This idea has been around for a long time. When I was in school, one of
our projects was to build a processor for such an architecture. The
idea has been kicked around the gnu development toolchain community for
some time as well.
Gcc is sexy. You shouldn't have any trouble finding a student or
another volunteer who's interested in implementing a simple, relatively
orthogonal instruction set.
Gas is harder. It's not so sexy. Nor is ld, nor gdb.
Porting linux at that point is pretty much just a matter of determining
cpu start and load addresses.
Note: mmu management would also be a modest task, either to implement or
to circumvent.
--rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-10 16:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question? Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 17:55 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-10 18:59 ` WaxDragon
2006-10-10 19:10 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 20:34 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-10 20:44 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 22:00 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 2:39 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-11 12:05 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-11 17:20 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 17:32 ` K. Richard Pixley [this message]
2006-10-11 17:32 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 18:04 ` Brian Wheeler
2006-10-11 19:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-10-11 19:38 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 20:02 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-13 22:31 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-14 8:14 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-14 14:11 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-10 23:51 ` Aurelien Jarno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 21:03 Ben Taylor
2006-10-11 22:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452D2AA5.4000404@palmsource.com \
--to=rich.pixley@palmsource.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.