From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix up generic csum_ipv6_magic function prototype
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:25:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061113092515.GS29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061113091222.GA26628@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:12:22AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:52:23AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > After doing the above we have the following:
> >
> > Platform-dependent:
> > __wsum csum_tcpudp_nofold(__be32, __be32, T1, T2, __wsum);
> > On arm/arm26: T1 = unsigned short, T2 = unsigned int.
> > __sum16 csum_tcpudp_magic(__be32, __be32, unsigned short, T, __wsum);
> > On arm/arm26 T is unsigned int, elsewhere it's unsigned short.
>
> Could both become unsigned short or unsigned int. Would prefer
> unsigned int on ARM, since otherwise the compiler generate code to
> truncate any variable "int"s to an unsigned short.
Frankly, as for the generated code... I'd expect s/htons(len)/len * 256/
and the same for proto in there to have much more effect. And it does give
the same checksum...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-09 2:02 [patch] fix up generic csum_ipv6_magic function prototype Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-09 7:00 ` David Miller
2006-11-09 7:22 ` Al Viro
2006-11-09 7:55 ` David Miller
2006-11-13 8:52 ` Al Viro
2006-11-13 9:12 ` Russell King
2006-11-13 9:25 ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-11-13 9:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-14 0:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061113092515.GS29920@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.