From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: akpm@osdl.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061115173643.GA17695@lst.de> (raw)
This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
get it in purely through -mm?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: akpm@osdl.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061115173643.GA17695@lst.de> (raw)
This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
get it in purely through -mm?
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-15 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-15 17:36 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2006-11-15 17:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-16 10:53 ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2006-11-16 10:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061115173643.GA17695@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.