* [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
@ 2006-11-15 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-11-15 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, davem; +Cc: netdev, linux-mm
This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
get it in purely through -mm?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
@ 2006-11-15 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-11-15 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, davem; +Cc: netdev, linux-mm
This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
get it in purely through -mm?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
2006-11-15 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2006-11-15 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-mm
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:36:43 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
> implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
> struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
> don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
> how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
> and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
> code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
> get it in purely through -mm?
If Dave wants to nod at it then I can merge all of it, else I can hand
patch 3/3 over to Dave once its prerequisites are in mainline.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
@ 2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2006-11-15 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-mm
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:36:43 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> This is the final version of the node-aware skb allocations,
> implementing davem's suggestion of storing the numa node in
> struct device. I'd love to get this into 2.6.20 now that I
> don't hear negative comments about it anymre, but I wonder
> how. The first patch toches mm/slab.c, the second struct device
> and assorted files and only the last one is actually in the networking
> code. Should Dave push all this through net-2.6.20 or should we
> get it in purely through -mm?
If Dave wants to nod at it then I can merge all of it, else I can hand
patch 3/3 over to Dave once its prerequisites are in mainline.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations
2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2006-11-16 10:53 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller, Andrew Morton @ 2006-11-16 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: hch, netdev, linux-mm
> If Dave wants to nod at it then I can merge all of it, else I can hand
> patch 3/3 over to Dave once its prerequisites are in mainline.
I'm completely fine with this, nice work Christoph.
Andrew, just toss it all into your tree for now.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-16 10:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-15 17:36 [PATCH 0/3] node-aware skb allocations Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-15 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-16 10:53 ` David Miller, Andrew Morton
2006-11-16 10:53 ` David Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.