From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>
To: linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Cc: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Milind Choudhary <milindchoudhary@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] BIT macro cleanup
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:39:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702242239.33314.dtor@insightbb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E036AB.9050303@student.ltu.se>
On Saturday 24 February 2007 07:59, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:43:44PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Is the reason for the modulo to put a bitmask larger then the variable
> >> into an array?
> >>
> >
> > The complementary LONG() macro will tell you the index of an array of
> > longs where the bit should be set.
> >
> This may be a little OT, but how come it is not done as an function?
> Maybe something like "(set/get)_long_mask(...)".
We have it. Is is called set_bit (or __set_bit) and works wery well for
single bit operations, but sometimes it is nice to be able to write
a = BIT(b) | BIT(c);
--
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>
To: linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Cc: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Milind Choudhary <milindchoudhary@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [KJ][RFC][PATCH] BIT macro cleanup
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:39:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702242239.33314.dtor@insightbb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E036AB.9050303@student.ltu.se>
On Saturday 24 February 2007 07:59, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:43:44PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Is the reason for the modulo to put a bitmask larger then the variable
> >> into an array?
> >>
> >
> > The complementary LONG() macro will tell you the index of an array of
> > longs where the bit should be set.
> >
> This may be a little OT, but how come it is not done as an function?
> Maybe something like "(set/get)_long_mask(...)".
We have it. Is is called set_bit (or __set_bit) and works wery well for
single bit operations, but sometimes it is nice to be able to write
a = BIT(b) | BIT(c);
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-25 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3b44d3fb0702222056k1d2a9b57q69a3555a09a9058e@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-23 8:14 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] BIT macro cleanup Milind Choudhary
2007-02-23 8:26 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Milind Choudhary
2007-02-23 8:56 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 8:56 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 10:15 ` Milind Choudhary
2007-02-23 10:27 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Milind Choudhary
2007-02-23 14:10 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 14:10 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 14:57 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 14:57 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 16:08 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 16:08 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 17:05 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 17:05 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 18:15 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 18:15 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 18:37 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 18:37 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 19:11 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 19:11 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 21:58 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 21:58 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-23 22:43 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-23 22:43 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-24 11:11 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Vojtech Pavlik
2007-02-24 11:11 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Vojtech Pavlik
2007-02-24 12:59 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-24 12:59 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-25 3:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2007-02-25 3:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-24 19:11 ` Milind Arun Choudhary
2007-02-24 19:23 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Milind Arun Choudhary
2007-02-25 15:45 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-25 15:45 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Richard Knutsson
2007-02-25 3:37 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-25 3:37 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-24 10:46 ` [KJ] [RFC][PATCH] " Vojtech Pavlik
2007-02-24 10:46 ` [KJ][RFC][PATCH] " Vojtech Pavlik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702242239.33314.dtor@insightbb.com \
--to=dtor@insightbb.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milindchoudhary@gmail.com \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.