From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sam@ravnborg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls.
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:43:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309084340.GA29959@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:13PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Most system calls seem to get added to i386 first. This patch
> automatically generates a warning for any new system call which is
> implemented on i386 but not the architecture currently being compiled.
> On PowerPC at the moment, for example, it results in these warnings:
> init/missing_syscalls.h:935:3: warning: #warning syscall sync_file_range not implemented
> init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented
> init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
You might also like to add:
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
since I did resolve the issues with getting a sed expression which
did the right thing, rather than your for loop, awk, echo, and
providing a way to ignore the lack of certain syscall numbers...
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls.
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:43:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309084340.GA29959@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:13PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Most system calls seem to get added to i386 first. This patch
> automatically generates a warning for any new system call which is
> implemented on i386 but not the architecture currently being compiled.
> On PowerPC at the moment, for example, it results in these warnings:
> init/missing_syscalls.h:935:3: warning: #warning syscall sync_file_range not implemented
> init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented
> init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
You might also like to add:
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
since I did resolve the issues with getting a sed expression which
did the right thing, rather than your for loop, awk, echo, and
providing a way to ignore the lack of certain syscall numbers...
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 23:01 [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls David Woodhouse
2007-03-09 0:14 ` David Miller
2007-03-09 0:14 ` David Miller
2007-03-09 0:18 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-09 0:18 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-20 12:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-03-20 12:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-03-09 3:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-03-09 3:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-03-09 8:43 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-03-09 8:43 ` Russell King
2007-03-09 16:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-09 16:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-09 16:38 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-03-09 16:38 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-03-09 19:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-09 19:35 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-03-09 19:35 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-03-10 9:58 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-03-10 9:58 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-03-09 19:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-09 20:13 ` Russell King
2007-03-09 20:13 ` Russell King
2007-03-09 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-09 16:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-09 16:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-09 18:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-09 18:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-10 9:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-03-10 9:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-03-09 17:20 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-09 17:20 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-19 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-19 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-20 7:43 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-20 7:43 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-20 10:51 ` David Howells
2007-03-20 10:51 ` David Howells
2007-03-20 10:56 ` Russell King
2007-03-20 10:56 ` Russell King
2007-03-21 11:25 ` David Woodhouse
2007-03-21 11:25 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070309084340.GA29959@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.