From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:55:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309205537.GG10394@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703100715.39354.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:15:38AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> How odd. I would have thought that if an interaction was to occur it would
> have been without the new feature. Clearly what you describe without NO_HZ is
> not the expected behaviour with RSDL. I wonder what went wrong. Are you on
> 100HZ on that laptop? While I expect 100HZ should be ok, it might just not
> be... My laptop is about the same performance and works fine with 100HZ under
> load of all sorts BUT I don't have Beryl (which I would have thought swayed
> things in the opposite direction also).
Note I also did a test with metacity and got more or less the same
results.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 5:39 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 6:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 7:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:20 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:39 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 18:27 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:15 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:26 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:51 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:55 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-03-09 20:46 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:07 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:19 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:39 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:18 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:29 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 23:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 23:06 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 0:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 0:49 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 1:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 1:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 2:10 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-10 2:20 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 2:26 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 2:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-09 22:12 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:20 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 22:31 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-10 1:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 1:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 17:01 ` James Cloos
2007-03-10 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:38 ` James Cloos
2007-03-11 12:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 9:07 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 9:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 10:36 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 18:07 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-09 18:24 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-09 20:23 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 18:21 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-10 23:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 23:38 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 18:21 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-13 20:26 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 22:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070309205537.GG10394@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.