From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:26:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070310022656.GQ10394@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703101320.23125.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:20:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Progress at last! And without any patches! Well those look very reasonable to
> me. Especially since -j5 is a worst case scenario.
Well that's with a noyield patch and your sched_tick fix.
> But would you say it's still _adequate_ with ccache considering you
> only have 1/6th cpu left for X? With and without ccache it's quite a
> different workload so they will behave differently.
No, I don't think 1/6th is being left for X in the ccache case so I
think there's a bug lurking here. My memload, execload, and forkload
test cases did better even with X niced.
To confirm, I've just run 15 instances of memload with unniced Xorg
and it performs better than make -j 5 with ccache.
If I have some time tomorrow, I'll try to do a straight -mm1 to mm2
comparison with different loads.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 5:39 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 6:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 7:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:20 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:39 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 18:27 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:15 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:26 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:51 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:55 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:46 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:07 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:19 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:39 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:18 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:29 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 23:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 23:06 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 0:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 0:49 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 1:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 1:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 2:10 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-10 2:20 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 2:26 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-03-10 2:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-09 22:12 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:20 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 22:31 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-10 1:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 1:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 17:01 ` James Cloos
2007-03-10 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:38 ` James Cloos
2007-03-11 12:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 8:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 9:07 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 9:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 10:36 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 18:07 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-09 18:24 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-09 20:23 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 18:21 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-10 23:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 23:38 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 18:21 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-13 20:26 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 22:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070310022656.GQ10394@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.