All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:15:38 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703100715.39354.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070309182744.GC10394@waste.org>

On Saturday 10 March 2007 05:27, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:39:05PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Friday 09 March 2007 19:20, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > And I've just rebooted with NO_HZ and things are greatly improved. At
> > > idle, Beryl effects are silky smooth (possibly better than stock) and
> > > shows less load. Under 'make', Beryl is still responsive as is Galeon.
> > > No sign of lagging mouse or typing.
> > >
> > > Under make -j 5, things are intermittent. Galeon scrolling is
> > > sometimes still responsive, but Beryl, terminals and mouse still drag
> > > quite a bit.
> >
> > I just replied before you sent this one out I think our messages passed
> > each other across the ocean somewhere. I don't quite get what combination
> > of factors you're saying here caused great improvement. Was it enabling
> > NO_HZ on mainline cpu scheduler or disabling NO_HZ or on RSDL?
>
> Turning on NO_HZ on RSDL greatly improved it. I have not tried NO_HZ
> on mainline. The first test was with NO_HZ=n, the second was with
> NO_HZ=y.

How odd. I would have thought that if an interaction was to occur it would 
have been without the new feature. Clearly what you describe without NO_HZ is 
not the expected behaviour with RSDL. I wonder what went wrong. Are you on 
100HZ on that laptop? While I expect 100HZ should be ok, it might just not 
be... My laptop is about the same performance and works fine with 100HZ under 
load of all sorts BUT I don't have Beryl (which I would have thought swayed 
things in the opposite direction also).

> As an aside, we should not name config options NO_* or DISABLE_*
> because of the potential for double negation.

Case in point,  I couldn't figure out what you were saying :)

-- 
-ck

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-09 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09  5:39 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  6:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09  7:53   ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:20     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:39       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 18:27         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:15           ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-03-09 20:26             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:51               ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:55             ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:46         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:07           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:19             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:39               ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:57                 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:18                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:29                     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 23:02                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 23:06                         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  0:31                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  0:34                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  0:49                         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  1:28                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  1:42                             ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  2:10                               ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-10  2:20                               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  2:26                                 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  2:53                                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:57                 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-09 22:12                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:20                     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 22:31                     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-10  1:02                     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  1:10                       ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 17:01             ` James Cloos
2007-03-10 23:16               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:38                 ` James Cloos
2007-03-11 12:52                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:10           ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:36     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09  9:07       ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09  9:49         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 10:36           ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 18:07             ` Mark Lord
2007-03-09 18:24               ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-09 20:23               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 18:21                 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-10 23:34                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 23:38                     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 18:21                     ` Mark Lord
2007-03-13 20:26                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 22:06                         ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703100715.39354.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.