From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:23:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703122223.07048.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070312110833.GA12835@elte.hu>
On Monday 12 March 2007 22:08, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > The test scenario was one any desktop user might do with every
> > expectation responsiveness of the interactive application remain
> > intact. I understand the concepts here Con, and I'm not knocking your
> > scheduler. I find it to be a step forward on the one hand, but a step
> > backward on the other.
>
> ok, then that step backward needs to be fixed.
>
> > > We are getting good interactive response with a fair scheduler yet
> > > you seem intent on overloading it to find fault with it.
> >
> > I'm not trying to find fault, I'm TESTING AND REPORTING. Was.
>
> Con, could you please take Mike's report of this regression seriously
> and address it? Thanks,
Sure.
Mike the cpu is being proportioned out perfectly according to fairness as I
mentioned in the prior email, yet X is getting the lower latency scheduling.
I'm not sure within the bounds of fairness what more would you have happen to
your liking with this test case?
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 3:57 [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 11:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 11:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-11 12:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 21:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 7:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 7:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 8:29 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 9:22 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 9:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 10:27 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 10:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:23 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-03-12 13:48 ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-12 18:09 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 14:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-12 18:10 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 20:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 4:17 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-13 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 18:49 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:06 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 17:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-12 20:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:38 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 20:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 22:51 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 5:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 5:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 6:08 ` [ck] " Rodney Gordon II
2007-03-13 6:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 7:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 8:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 9:21 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 9:41 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 10:50 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13 9:31 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 10:24 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 23:19 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2007-03-13 9:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 10:06 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 11:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 11:41 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-13 11:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 15:36 ` John Stoffel
2007-03-13 14:17 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-13 15:15 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 17:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 19:58 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 20:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 20:35 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13 20:27 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-16 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-12 23:43 ` David Lang
2007-03-13 2:23 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-13 6:00 ` David Lang
2007-03-12 21:34 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 21:38 ` michael chang
2007-03-13 0:09 ` Thibaut VARENE
2007-03-13 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 6:16 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 6:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 21:05 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-12 21:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 9:38 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12 10:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-14 2:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-14 3:25 ` Gabriel C
2007-03-14 9:44 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 14:32 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 6:58 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-12 11:16 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:49 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:58 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:34 ` Gene Heskett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-12 19:53 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703122223.07048.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.