All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:31:38 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703132031.39370.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703132021.50712.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 20:21, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 19:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > [...] The situation as we speak is that you can run cpu intensive
> > > tasks while watching eye-candy.  With RSDL, you can't, you feel the
> > > non-interactive load instantly. [...]
> >
> > i have to agree with Mike that this is a material regression that cannot
> > be talked around.
> >
> > Con, we want RSDL to /improve/ interactivity. Having new scheduler
> > interactivity logic that behaves /worse/ in the presence of CPU hogs,
> > which CPU hogs are even reniced to +5, than the current interactivity
> > code, is i think a non-starter. Could you try to fix this, please? Good
> > interactivity in the presence of CPU hogs (be them default nice level or
> > nice +5) is _the_ most important scheduler interactivity metric.
> > Anything else is really secondary.
>
> Well I guess you must have missed where I asked him if he would be happy if
> I changed +5 metrics to do whatever he wanted and he refused to answer me.
> That would easily fit within that scheme. Any percentage of nice value he
> chose. I suggest 50% of nice 0. Heck I can even increase it if he likes.
> All I asked for was an answer as to whether that would satisfy his
> criterion.

It seem Mike has chosen to go silent so I'll guess on his part. 

nice on my debian etch seems to choose nice +10 without arguments contrary to 
a previous discussion that said 4 was the default. However 4 is a good value 
to use as a base of sorts.

What I propose is as a proportion of nice 0:
nice 4 1/2
nice 8 1/4
nice 12 1/8
nice 16 1/16
nice 20 1/32 (of course nice 20 doesn't exist)

and we can do the opposite in the other direction
nice -4 2
nice -8 4
nice -12 8
nice -16 16
nice -20 32

Assuming no further discussion is forthcoming I'll implement that along with 
Al's suggestion for staggering the latencies better with nice differences 
since the two are changing the same thing.

-- 
-ck

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-13  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-11  3:57 [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 11:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 11:48   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:08     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 12:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-11 12:20     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 21:18       ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12  7:22     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12  7:48       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12  8:29         ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12  8:55           ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12  9:22             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12  9:38               ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 10:27                 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 10:57                   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:08                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:23                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 13:48                         ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-12 18:09                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 14:34                         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 15:26                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-12 18:10                             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:36                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 20:36                             ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  4:17                             ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-13  8:09                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 18:49                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:06                             ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 17:21                               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-12 20:11                             ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:38                               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 20:45                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 22:51                                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13  5:10                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  5:53                                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13  6:08                                         ` [ck] " Rodney Gordon II
2007-03-13  6:17                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  7:53                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  8:22                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13  8:18                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13  8:22                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  9:21                                         ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13  9:29                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13  9:41                                             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 10:50                                               ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13  9:31                                           ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-03-13 10:24                                             ` [ck] " Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 23:19                                               ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2007-03-13  9:33                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  9:39                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 10:06                                             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 11:23                                               ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 11:41                                                 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-13 11:46                                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 15:36                                                   ` John Stoffel
2007-03-13 14:17                                           ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-13 15:15                                         ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 17:59                                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 19:58                                             ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 20:10                                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 20:35                                                 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13 20:27                                               ` Bill Huey
2007-03-16 16:42                                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-12 23:43                                   ` David Lang
2007-03-13  2:23                                     ` Lee Revell
2007-03-13  6:00                                       ` David Lang
2007-03-12 21:34                                 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 21:38                                 ` michael chang
2007-03-13  0:09                                   ` Thibaut VARENE
2007-03-13  6:08                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13  6:16                                     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13  6:30                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:42                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 21:05                               ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-12 21:41                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:25                       ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12  9:38               ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12 10:34                 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38                   ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-14  2:25                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-14  3:25                       ` Gabriel C
2007-03-14  9:44                         ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12  8:44         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 14:32   ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12  6:58     ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-12 11:16       ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:49         ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:58           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38             ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:34               ` Gene Heskett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703132031.39370.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.