From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Eugeny Mints <eugeny@nomadgs.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: Alternative Concept
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:34:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070313203458.GA1213@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070313110851.GB10702@elf.ucw.cz>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I believe this power parameter framework should solve many (if not
> > all) of the issues raised by using operating points as the base
> > abstraction and provide a common layer across architectures. Eugeny
> > and I have the beginnings of an API proposal for this framework, but
> > we wanted to get some high level feedback on the concepts so we can
> > adjust the API if necessary. So, comments?
>
> Looks better than powerop certainly.
>
> Perhaps first step would be to convert cpufreq to this new framework?
The first step is to get a parameter framework in upstream.
It will take some time for the applications of this proposed framework
to materialize and drive the maturing of the implementation. These
won't get written unless a framework is upstream.
I don't know if having cpufreq plug into this framework will ever make a
lot of sense. However; it would be simple to create a cpufreq driver
that access the parameter layer for some selected platforms. (N800?)
--mgross
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-13 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 1:23 [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3 Eugeny S. Mints
2006-10-07 2:36 ` Alternative Concept [Was: Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3] Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-07 3:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-08 7:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-12 15:38 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-12 16:02 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-16 21:56 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-17 21:40 ` Matthew Locke
2006-10-12 16:48 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-12 17:12 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-10-12 17:23 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-09 18:21 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-26 3:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-12 22:43 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-10-13 10:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-16 21:44 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-17 8:26 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-26 3:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
2007-03-13 0:57 ` Alternative Concept Matthew Locke
2007-03-13 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-13 20:34 ` Mark Gross [this message]
2007-03-14 2:30 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-14 10:43 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-14 17:19 ` David Brownell
2007-03-14 18:12 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-14 18:45 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 9:53 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 13:04 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-16 2:21 ` David Brownell
2007-03-16 3:56 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-16 6:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-19 2:27 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-19 6:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-16 13:06 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-16 18:03 ` David Brownell
2007-03-18 20:25 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-19 4:04 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 0:03 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 8:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 9:45 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 10:30 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 12:13 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-20 12:39 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 13:44 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 21:03 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 13:07 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 13:52 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 14:58 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 15:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 19:16 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 22:04 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 22:06 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 23:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 15:36 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 19:17 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 20:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 20:21 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 19:58 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 0:47 ` charging batteries from USB [was: Re: Alternative Concept] Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 1:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 1:48 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 2:35 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 10:20 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-24 8:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-14 3:19 ` Alternative Concept Dominik Brodowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-14 22:08 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-14 23:23 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 7:25 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-15 8:14 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-15 10:55 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 10:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 10:33 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 13:21 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 13:29 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 23:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 14:00 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 14:38 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 17:33 ` Woodruff, Richard
2007-03-19 14:12 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-20 7:56 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 14:26 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-20 15:08 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 17:04 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070313203458.GA1213@linux.intel.com \
--to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eugeny@nomadgs.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.