From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
devzero@web.de, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:05:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070402020530.GA589@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46100EF5.7040802@nagafix.co.uk>
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation.
Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that you
don't have now.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
devzero@web.de, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:05:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070402020530.GA589@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46100EF5.7040802@nagafix.co.uk>
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation.
Why? I've never understood what a framebuffer gives you that you
don't have now.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-02 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-31 22:58 [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ? devzero
2007-04-01 0:01 ` Parag Warudkar
2007-04-01 19:08 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-04-01 19:08 ` Blaisorblade
2007-04-01 19:58 ` [uml-devel] " Antoine Martin
2007-04-01 19:58 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 2:05 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-04-02 2:05 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 10:21 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 10:21 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 11:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-02 11:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-02 12:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-02 12:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-02 14:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 14:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 15:43 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 15:43 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-03 23:49 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-03 23:49 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-04 6:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-04 6:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-04-04 20:27 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-04 20:27 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 14:55 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 14:55 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 15:43 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 15:43 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-02 20:40 ` roland
2007-04-02 20:40 ` roland
2007-04-02 21:44 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-02 21:44 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-03 4:44 ` Jason Lunz
2007-04-03 4:44 ` Jason Lunz
2007-04-03 17:43 ` Blaisorblade
2007-04-03 17:43 ` Blaisorblade
2007-04-03 17:53 ` Antoine Martin
2007-04-03 17:53 ` Antoine Martin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-03 8:28 roland
2007-04-03 18:01 ` Jason Lunz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070402020530.GA589@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=devzero@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.