From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nanhai.zou@intel.com,
asit.k.mallick@intel.com, keith.packard@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:00:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705181400.12811.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070517230324.GB8089@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Friday 18 May 2007 01:03, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> Normally, the EOI generated by local APIC for level trigger interrupt
> contains vector number. The IOAPIC will take this vector number and
> search the IOAPIC RTE entries for an entry with matching vector number and
> clear the remote IRR bit (indicate EOI). However, if the vector number is
> changed (as in step 3) the IOAPIC will not find the RTE entry when the EOI
> is received later. This will cause the remote IRR to get stuck causing the
> interrupt hang (no more interrupt from this RTE).
Does this happen often or did you only see it in some extreme or obscure
case?
> + /*
> + * If the EOI still didn't reach the RTE corresponding to the
> + * level triggered irq, postpone the irq migration to the next
> + * irq arrival event.
> + */
> + if (pending_eoi(irq)) {
> + irq_desc[irq].status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
> + return;
Other code seems to have similar problems, but we don't have any lock
protecting that bitmap against parallel updates outside the irq itself, don't
we? Perhaps it needs to be all set_bit()
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-17 23:03 [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-17 23:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 0:43 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 0:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 1:01 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 14:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 17:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:07 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 18:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:39 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 19:18 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-31 2:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 12:00 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-05-18 14:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 11:34 ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 12:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 13:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 20:02 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-31 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 13:50 ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 20:00 ` Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705181400.12811.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keith.packard@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.