From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:16:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705251516.19173.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705242316.48558.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:16:48 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Above that, the commiter DID IGNORE your baselines of testing, but at the same
> time got highly profile-neurotic regarding the copyright issue of 2007,
> didn't he (Let's call this a basic instinct of our precedents: the apes:
> shouting: I, I, I, more, more, more)?
????
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-24 19:56 BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Uwe Bugla
2007-05-24 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 21:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 13:16 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-05-25 13:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:20 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 14:52 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 15:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 16:23 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 18:48 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-25 19:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 5:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 9:39 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-26 10:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:36 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 15:52 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:50 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 16:20 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:46 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 16:21 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:26 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:40 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:04 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 17:18 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:24 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 18:03 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 19:38 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:57 ` Larry Finger
2007-05-26 20:22 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 20:33 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:41 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-05-26 18:46 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:58 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:14 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:19 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:39 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:49 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 21:32 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2007-05-26 22:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:58 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:04 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 12:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:14 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 22:42 ` David Miller
2007-05-25 16:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 18:42 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 20:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-27 10:46 Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 13:41 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705251516.19173.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.