All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705262003.17403.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705261924.33802.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>

On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:24:33 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > > clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and
> > > comprehensive.
> >
> > Why don't you simply submit a patch to change the helptext then?
> > I'm not sure why you refuse to DO anything about the "mess", but
> > instead keep poking me that I am responsible somehow to fix it up
> > for you...
> 
> I need exception examples for doing so. What are the exception examples?
> 
> Apart from that you have don nothing except than guessing around.

Admit it. You don't know how debugging is done in the real world.
Debugging _IS_ guessing around.

> Now here comes the LAST proof that your code is buggy:
> 
> A. It's not mm-implementation
> B. It's not user behaviour or fault
> C. It's not an ACPI issue
> 
> BUT ONE AND ONLY:
> 
> D. It's your code that is buggy, without any doubt!

Blahblah. Did you even read the mail I CCed to you?
It "proves" (to use your wording) the exact opposite.

> OK, went Andrew's path: patched 2.6.22-rc3 with wireless tree:
> 
> Result: The NIC driver b44 and ssb are loaded correctly, but refuse to work
> (no network communication possible).

Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that:

git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git

It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works fine for me.

> dmesg:
> 
...

Ok, config and dmesg looks OK to me, now.


-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-26 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-24 19:56 BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Uwe Bugla
2007-05-24 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 21:16   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 13:16     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:12   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:20     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:59     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 14:52       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 15:59         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 16:23           ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 18:48           ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-25 19:40             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26  5:00               ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26  9:39                 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-26 10:40                 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:36                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 15:52                     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:50                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:13                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 16:20                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:46                         ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 16:21                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:26                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:40                           ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:04                             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 17:18                               ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:24                                 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 18:03                                   ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-05-26 18:19                                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 19:38                                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:57                                         ` Larry Finger
2007-05-26 20:22                                           ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 20:33                                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:00                                             ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:41                                 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-05-26 18:46                                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:58                                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:14                                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:19                                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:39                                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:49                                         ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 21:32                                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:52                                             ` Dan Williams
2007-05-26 22:16                                               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:58                                             ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:04                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 12:12                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:14                     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 22:42                   ` David Miller
2007-05-25 16:56         ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 18:42           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 20:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-27 10:46 Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 13:41 ` Kyle Moffett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705262003.17403.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.