All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
Cc: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:00:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705262300.36611.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705262233.15529.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>

On Saturday 26 May 2007 22:33:13 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie:
> > Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you,
> > > Andrew.
> > >
> > > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device!
> >
> > Could you please send the following:
> >
> > 1. the output of lsmod from the non-functioning kernel
> 
> Nonsense!
> As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly.
> So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa!

Ok, Uwe. Now I show you some real life examples how you and how
someone who is polite answers to the same question:

You:
> Nonsense!
> As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly.
> So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa!

> They are already in the thread. So please leave me alone with those lazy
> hints! Read bfore you post, not vice versa!


Someone who is polite:
> They are already in the thread.


So you see the difference? And do you see why everybody in this
thread is so pissed about you?

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-26 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-24 19:56 BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Uwe Bugla
2007-05-24 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 21:16   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 13:16     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:12   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:20     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:59     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 14:52       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 15:59         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 16:23           ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 18:48           ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-25 19:40             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26  5:00               ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26  9:39                 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-26 10:40                 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:36                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 15:52                     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:50                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:13                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 16:20                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:46                         ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 16:21                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:26                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:40                           ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:04                             ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 17:18                               ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:24                                 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 18:03                                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:19                                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 19:38                                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:57                                         ` Larry Finger
2007-05-26 20:22                                           ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 20:33                                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:00                                             ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-05-26 18:41                                 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-05-26 18:46                                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:58                                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:14                                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:19                                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:39                                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:49                                         ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 21:32                                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:52                                             ` Dan Williams
2007-05-26 22:16                                               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:58                                             ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:04                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 12:12                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:14                     ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 22:42                   ` David Miller
2007-05-25 16:56         ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 18:42           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 20:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-27 10:46 Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 13:41 ` Kyle Moffett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705262300.36611.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.