[PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Sunday, 29 July 2007 12:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > 
> > > OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require
> > > quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures.
> > 
> > Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind. 
> >
> > Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already 
> > sent out. This is all intertwined..
> 
> OK, it took more time than I had hoped, but I wanted CONFIG_HIBERNATION and
> CONFIG_SUSPEND to be really independent of each other.
> 
> The two patches in the next messages implement the idea:
> * replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> * introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary,
>   and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each
>   other.

Unfortunately, the patches that I have posted are against 2.6.23-rc1 with the
suspend and hibernation patchset applied
(http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.23-rc1/patches/) .

Sorry for that.

The corresponding patches on top of the current -git are in the next two
messages.

They do the following:
* replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION
* introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary,
  and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each
  other
* update the top-level PM-related headers and the ACPI code related to suspend
  and hibernation to use the new definitions

Greetings,
Rafael