From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman)
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:14:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807111430.f35c03c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070807165546.GA7603@skynet.ie>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:55:47 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> On (06/08/07 22:12), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:55:41 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> >
> > > On (06/08/07 22:31), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:
> > > >
> > > > > If correct, I would suggest merging the horrible hack for .23 then taking
> > > > > it out when we merge "grouping pages by mobility". But what if we don't do
> > > > > that merge?
> > > >
> > > > Or disable ZONE_MOVABLE until it is usable?
> > >
> > > It's usable now. The issue with policies only occurs if the user specifies
> > > kernelcore= or movablecore= on the command-line. Your language suggests
> > > that you believe policies are not applied when ZONE_MOVABLE is configured
> > > at build-time.
> >
> > So.. the problem which we're fixing here is only present when someone
> > use kernelcore=. This is in fact an argument for _not_ merging the
> > horrible-hack.
> >
>
> It's even more constrained than that. It only applies to the MPOL_BIND
> policy when kernelcore= is specified. The other policies work the same
> as they ever did.
so.. should we forget about merging the horrible-hack?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:14:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807111430.f35c03c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070807165546.GA7603@skynet.ie>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:55:47 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> On (06/08/07 22:12), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:55:41 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> >
> > > On (06/08/07 22:31), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:
> > > >
> > > > > If correct, I would suggest merging the horrible hack for .23 then taking
> > > > > it out when we merge "grouping pages by mobility". But what if we don't do
> > > > > that merge?
> > > >
> > > > Or disable ZONE_MOVABLE until it is usable?
> > >
> > > It's usable now. The issue with policies only occurs if the user specifies
> > > kernelcore= or movablecore= on the command-line. Your language suggests
> > > that you believe policies are not applied when ZONE_MOVABLE is configured
> > > at build-time.
> >
> > So.. the problem which we're fixing here is only present when someone
> > use kernelcore=. This is in fact an argument for _not_ merging the
> > horrible-hack.
> >
>
> It's even more constrained than that. It only applies to the MPOL_BIND
> policy when kernelcore= is specified. The other policies work the same
> as they ever did.
so.. should we forget about merging the horrible-hack?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 17:21 [PATCH] Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 17:21 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 19:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 19:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 20:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 20:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-06 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-06 20:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 20:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 21:56 ` Paul Jackson
2007-08-06 21:56 ` Paul Jackson
2007-08-03 22:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-03 22:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-04 0:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-04 0:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-04 8:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-04 8:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-04 16:39 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-04 16:39 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-06 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-06 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-06 19:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 19:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-06 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-06 21:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-06 21:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-07 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-07 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-07 18:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-07 18:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07 20:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07 20:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-08 16:49 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-08 16:49 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-08 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-08 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 21:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-06 21:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-06 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 22:57 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-06 22:57 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070807111430.f35c03c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.