[PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture

[PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture

[Hans-Jürgen Koch]

The config system doesn't show the UIO menu if arch=arm, this patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Hans J. Koch <hjk@linutronix.de>

---
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:52:02.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:53:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@
 
 source "drivers/dma/Kconfig"
 
+source "drivers/uio/Kconfig"
+
 endmenu
 
 source "fs/Kconfig"

Re: [rfc] Re: [PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Aug 8 2007 18:08, Hans-J??rgen Koch wrote:
> >---
> >Index: linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >===================================================================
> >--- linux-2.6.23-rc.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:52:02.000000000 +0200
> >+++ linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:53:29.000000000 +0200
> >@@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@
> > 
> > source "drivers/dma/Kconfig"
> > 
> >+source "drivers/uio/Kconfig"
> >+
> > endmenu
> > 
> > source "fs/Kconfig"
> 
> I am raising a general question here.
> Should not such cross-platform things be made available in a general
> Kconfig rather than having to patch each arch's Kconfig?
> 
> I am thinking of drivers/Kconfig for this one (of course I am aware that this
> requires an extra "depends on X86 || SPARC || others" in drivers/pci/Kconfig),
> and perhaps even a top-level Kconfig for things like truly arch-independent
> fs/Kconfig.

Um, uio _is_ in drivers/Kconfig already :)

But I'm guessing that ARM doesn't use that file yet?  If so, I have no
objection to the above patch, but it should go through the ARM
developers, not me.

thanks,

greg k-h

[rfc] Re: [PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture

[Jan Engelhardt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 865 bytes --]


On Aug 8 2007 18:08, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
>---
>Index: linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig
>===================================================================
>--- linux-2.6.23-rc.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:52:02.000000000 +0200
>+++ linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:53:29.000000000 +0200
>@@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@
> 
> source "drivers/dma/Kconfig"
> 
>+source "drivers/uio/Kconfig"
>+
> endmenu
> 
> source "fs/Kconfig"

I am raising a general question here.
Should not such cross-platform things be made available in a general
Kconfig rather than having to patch each arch's Kconfig?

I am thinking of drivers/Kconfig for this one (of course I am aware that this
requires an extra "depends on X86 || SPARC || others" in drivers/pci/Kconfig),
and perhaps even a top-level Kconfig for things like truly arch-independent
fs/Kconfig.


	Jan
-- 

Re: [rfc] Re: [PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture

[Hans-Jürgen Koch]

Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 18:10 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > 
> > On Aug 8 2007 18:08, Hans-J??rgen Koch wrote:
> > >---
> > >Index: linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >===================================================================
> > >--- linux-2.6.23-rc.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:52:02.000000000 +0200
> > >+++ linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig	2007-08-08 17:53:29.000000000 +0200
> > >@@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@
> > > 
> > > source "drivers/dma/Kconfig"
> > > 
> > >+source "drivers/uio/Kconfig"
> > >+
> > > endmenu
> > > 
> > > source "fs/Kconfig"
> > 
> > I am raising a general question here.
> > Should not such cross-platform things be made available in a general
> > Kconfig rather than having to patch each arch's Kconfig?
> > 
> > I am thinking of drivers/Kconfig for this one (of course I am aware that this
> > requires an extra "depends on X86 || SPARC || others" in drivers/pci/Kconfig),
> > and perhaps even a top-level Kconfig for things like truly arch-independent
> > fs/Kconfig.
> 
> Um, uio _is_ in drivers/Kconfig already :)

Of course :-)

> 
> But I'm guessing that ARM doesn't use that file yet?  

No, they don't. They source Kconfigs from each drivers subdirectory.

> If so, I have no 
> objection to the above patch, but it should go through the ARM
> developers, not me.

OK, as I've CCed linux-arm-kernel, I hope Russell will do that.

Thanks,
Hans