From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on ia64
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:23:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070813112334.GJ24018@shell.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C03885.7000109@redhat.com>
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Use volatile consistently in atomic.h on ia64.
This will do weird things without Andreas Schwab's fix:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/410
Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
--- linux-2.6.23-rc3-orig/include/asm-ia64/atomic.h 2007-07-08 19:32:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc3/include/asm-ia64/atomic.h 2007-08-13 05:38:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -19,19 +19,34 @@
/*
* On IA-64, counter must always be volatile to ensure that that the
- * memory accesses are ordered.
+ * memory accesses are ordered. This must be enforced each time that
+ * counter is read or written.
*/
-typedef struct { volatile __s32 counter; } atomic_t;
-typedef struct { volatile __s64 counter; } atomic64_t;
+typedef struct { __s32 counter; } atomic_t;
+typedef struct { __s64 counter; } atomic64_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ((atomic_t) { (i) })
#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ((atomic64_t) { (i) })
-#define atomic_read(v) ((v)->counter)
-#define atomic64_read(v) ((v)->counter)
+static inline __s32 atomic_read(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return *(volatile __s32 *)&v->counter;
+}
+
+static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, __s32 i)
+{
+ *(volatile __s32 *)&v->counter = i;
+}
-#define atomic_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
-#define atomic64_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
+static inline __s64 atomic64_read(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ return *(volatile __s64 *)&v->counter;
+}
+
+static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, __s64 i)
+{
+ *(volatile __s64 *)&v->counter = i;
+}
static __inline__ int
ia64_atomic_add (int i, atomic_t *v)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 10:55 [PATCH 0/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent across all architectures Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:04 ` [PATCH 1/23] document preferred use of volatile with atomic_t Chris Snook
2007-08-13 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-14 22:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 22:53 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-14 22:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 22:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 23:25 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-14 23:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-16 21:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-13 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on alpha Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:09 ` [PATCH 3/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on arm Chris Snook
2007-08-13 12:19 ` Russell King
2007-08-13 12:46 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-13 12:59 ` Russell King
2007-08-13 11:11 ` [PATCH 4/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on avr32 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:12 ` [PATCH 5/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on blackfin Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:14 ` [PATCH 6/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on cris Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:15 ` [PATCH 7/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on frv Chris Snook
2007-08-14 9:42 ` David Howells
2007-08-13 11:18 ` [PATCH 8/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on h8300 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:21 ` [PATCH 9/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on i386 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:23 ` Chris Snook [this message]
2007-08-14 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on ia64 Luck, Tony
2007-08-14 18:27 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-14 18:48 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-14 22:06 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-14 22:06 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-14 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 22:21 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:24 ` [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Chris Snook
2007-08-22 1:56 ` Hirokazu Takata
2007-08-22 5:00 ` Hirokazu Takata
2007-08-22 14:06 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-22 14:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-22 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-23 19:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-23 20:05 ` David Howells
2007-08-23 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-23 20:39 ` David Schwartz
2007-08-23 20:40 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-13 11:26 ` [PATCH 12/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m68knommu Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m68k Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:29 ` [PATCH 14/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on mips Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on parisc Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH 16/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on s390 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:34 ` [PATCH 17/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on sh64 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:36 ` [PATCH 18/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on sh Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:40 ` [PATCH 19/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on sparc64 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:42 ` [PATCH 20/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on sparc Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:43 ` [PATCH 21/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on v850 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 22/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on x86_64 Chris Snook
2007-08-13 11:45 ` [PATCH 23/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on xtensa Chris Snook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070813112334.GJ24018@shell.boston.redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.