Re: [PATCH resubmit] /drivers/ata ioremap returncode check

[Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>]

On 21:42 Thu 23 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:34:58PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:
> > On 19:47 Wed 22 Aug 2007, Scott Thompson wrote:
> > > Patchset against 2.6.23-rc3.  corrects missing ioremap return 
> > > checks, resending after making changes suggested....
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Scott Thompson <postfail <at> hushmail.com>
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
> > > index 4ca7fd6..8dc7c3b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
> > > @@ -189,6 +189,10 @@ static __devinit int ixp4xx_pata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	data->cs0 = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, cs0->start, 0x1000);
> > >  	data->cs1 = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, cs1->start, 0x1000);
> > >  
> > > +	if (!data->cs0 || !data->cs1) {
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > 
> > You aren't following the Kernel CodingStyle there.  
> > 
> > See Documentation/CodingStyle:
> > 
> > "Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do."
> > 
> > +	if (!data->cs0 || !data->cs1)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> This and nice printk message absence. :)

Huh?  What do you mean?

Thanks,

	Brandon