From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:27:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187832907.3410.141.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it
> > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election.
>
> Exactly ... we want a process that's simple and transparent. We chose
> voting at the KS because almost all the attendees satisfy the "made
> significant contributions to Linux" requirement without us having to do
> anything or make any controversial determinations. Like Matt said,
> better suggestions are welcome.
This is a dumb suggestion, but...
How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree?
Might be worthwhile to allocate votes for Acked-By and so on, as well.
-andy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:27:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187832907.3410.141.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it
> > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election.
>
> Exactly ... we want a process that's simple and transparent. We chose
> voting at the KS because almost all the attendees satisfy the "made
> significant contributions to Linux" requirement without us having to do
> anything or make any controversial determinations. Like Matt said,
> better suggestions are welcome.
This is a dumb suggestion, but...
How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree?
Might be worthwhile to allocate votes for Acked-By and so on, as well.
-andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 15:22 [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections James Bottomley
2007-08-22 15:22 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 20:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Scott Preece
2007-08-22 20:56 ` Scott Preece
2007-08-22 21:26 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:26 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:22 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Jones
2007-08-22 21:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-22 21:33 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Chris Wright
2007-08-22 21:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-22 21:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-22 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:43 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:58 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-22 22:14 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 23:47 ` James Morris
2007-08-22 23:47 ` James Morris
2007-08-23 1:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 1:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 2:12 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 2:12 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 2:45 ` James Morris
2007-08-23 3:49 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 3:49 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 11:05 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 11:05 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-23 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-22 22:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-22 22:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-23 0:26 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 0:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 0:37 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 0:37 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 0:42 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 0:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 1:19 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 1:19 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 1:35 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2007-08-23 1:35 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-24 1:27 ` Andy Isaacson [this message]
2007-08-24 1:27 ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-24 2:34 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-24 2:34 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-24 2:52 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 2:52 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 2:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 2:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 3:22 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 3:22 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 15:57 ` Greg KH
2007-08-24 15:57 ` Greg KH
2007-08-24 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-24 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-24 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 23:48 ` Greg KH
2007-08-25 0:01 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: LinuxFoundation " Luck, Tony
2007-08-25 0:01 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-25 0:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-25 0:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-25 0:11 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-25 0:11 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-25 0:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-25 0:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-25 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-25 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-25 0:03 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation " Alan Cox
2007-08-25 0:03 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-27 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-27 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-27 12:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-27 12:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-27 12:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-27 12:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-27 15:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-27 15:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 2:56 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 2:56 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-28 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-28 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-29 11:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-29 11:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-29 17:58 ` Bdale Garbee
2007-08-29 17:58 ` Bdale Garbee
2007-08-24 4:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-24 4:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-24 11:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 11:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 12:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-24 12:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-24 13:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 13:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 10:45 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-24 10:45 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-28 22:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-28 22:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-29 3:04 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 3:04 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 3:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-08-29 3:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-08-29 11:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-29 11:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-29 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-29 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-24 10:41 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-24 10:41 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-24 13:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 13:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 13:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-24 13:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-25 17:59 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election Results James Bottomley
2007-09-25 17:59 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org \
--to=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.