From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:34:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070907153408.GG24638@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189121572.6672.36.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:32:52AM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Sorry. Of course, you have to copy the entire /lib, etc. onto the tmpfs,
> but you get the gist....
>
> The point is that it is easy to subvert userspace if you have enough
> privileges. In the above example it may not be entirely undetectable,
> but who here is running a script on every login to check that / is
> indeed uncompromised?
I suppose this is the motivation for things like the "secure attention
key"?
But I'm most curious actually about to what degree the kernel itself is
vulnerable to root (without a reboot). Is disabling /dev/kmem and
module-loading in theory enough? (Modulo bugs like filesystems that
aren't secure against untrusted filesystems, etc.)
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-07 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 14:12 NFS4 authentification / fsuid Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-30 14:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 14:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 14:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-30 15:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 21:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-06 8:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-06 8:29 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-06 15:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-06 23:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-06 23:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-07 15:34 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-09-18 23:27 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-18 23:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-06 15:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-06 23:30 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-06 23:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-07 0:56 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-07 5:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-07 5:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-07 6:37 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2007-09-18 23:48 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-18 23:44 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-19 5:16 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-19 12:16 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-19 13:49 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-09-19 14:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-19 15:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-20 7:03 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-19 16:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-09-20 7:15 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-30 15:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070907153408.GG24638@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satyam@infradead.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.