From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:15:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070926081534.GD11385@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070925124534.b9da41a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2007-09-25 21:45]:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:02 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > This patch adapts the ppc64 code to use the generic parse_crashkernel()
> > function introduced in the generic patch of that series.
>
> I really don't like to see patches get a wholesale replacement, especially
> when they've been looked at by a few people and have had some testing, etc.
> It's not possible to see what changed and people need to re-review stuff
> they've already reviewed, etc.
Sorry, I didn't know that this is the preferred way. I just thought
it's more clear if the patches are replaced if the patch set is
finally pushed into Linus' tree.
> diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void machine_kexec(struct kim
>
> void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> - unsigned long long crash_size = 0, crash_base;
> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> int ret;
>
> /* this is necessary because of lmb_phys_mem_size() */
> _
>
>
> which I suspect will now create a compiler warning.
No, it doesn't. I just verified this.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.o
LD arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o
Thanks,
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>, Architecture Maintenance
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:15:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070926081534.GD11385@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070925124534.b9da41a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2007-09-25 21:45]:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:02 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > This patch adapts the ppc64 code to use the generic parse_crashkernel()
> > function introduced in the generic patch of that series.
>
> I really don't like to see patches get a wholesale replacement, especially
> when they've been looked at by a few people and have had some testing, etc.
> It's not possible to see what changed and people need to re-review stuff
> they've already reviewed, etc.
Sorry, I didn't know that this is the preferred way. I just thought
it's more clear if the patches are replaced if the patch set is
finally pushed into Linus' tree.
> diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void machine_kexec(struct kim
>
> void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> - unsigned long long crash_size = 0, crash_base;
> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> int ret;
>
> /* this is necessary because of lmb_phys_mem_size() */
> _
>
>
> which I suspect will now create a compiler warning.
No, it doesn't. I just verified this.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.o
LD arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o
Thanks,
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>, Architecture Maintenance
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:15:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070926081534.GD11385@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070925124534.b9da41a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2007-09-25 21:45]:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:02 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > This patch adapts the ppc64 code to use the generic parse_crashkernel()
> > function introduced in the generic patch of that series.
>
> I really don't like to see patches get a wholesale replacement, especially
> when they've been looked at by a few people and have had some testing, etc.
> It's not possible to see what changed and people need to re-review stuff
> they've already reviewed, etc.
Sorry, I didn't know that this is the preferred way. I just thought
it's more clear if the patches are replaced if the patch set is
finally pushed into Linus' tree.
> diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void machine_kexec(struct kim
>
> void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> - unsigned long long crash_size = 0, crash_base;
> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> int ret;
>
> /* this is necessary because of lmb_phys_mem_size() */
> _
>
>
> which I suspect will now create a compiler warning.
No, it doesn't. I just verified this.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.o
LD arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o
Thanks,
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>, Architecture Maintenance
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-25 18:22 [patch 0/7] Add extended crashkernel command line syntax Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:22 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:22 ` [patch 1/7] Extended crashkernel command line Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:22 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 20:53 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-25 20:53 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-26 8:34 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 8:34 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 16:16 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 16:16 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 21:05 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 21:05 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 21:32 ` reviewed (Re: [patch 1/7] Extended crashkernel command line) Oleg Verych
2007-09-26 21:32 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-25 18:22 ` [patch 2/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on i386 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:22 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` [patch 3/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on x86_64 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` [patch 4/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ia64 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-25 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-25 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-26 8:15 ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2007-09-26 8:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-26 8:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` [patch 6/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on sh Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` [patch 7/7] Add documentation for extended crashkernel syntax Bernhard Walle
2007-09-25 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-20 17:18 [patch 0/7] Add extended crashkernel command line syntax Bernhard Walle
2007-09-20 17:18 ` [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-20 17:18 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-20 17:18 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-13 16:14 [patch 0/7] Add extended crashkernel command line syntax Bernhard Walle
2007-09-13 16:14 ` [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64 Bernhard Walle
2007-09-13 16:14 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-09-13 16:14 ` Bernhard Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070926081534.GD11385@suse.de \
--to=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.