From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] Added new checks for labeled IPsec & SECMARK [en|dis]able
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:06:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710080806.59404.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710071955.26628.paul.moore@hp.com>
On Sunday 07 October 2007 7:55:26 pm Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sunday 07 October 2007 5:53:11 pm James Morris wrote:
> > I think it'd be good to get these into 2.6.24. Any acks/nacks ?
Sorry, I thought you were asking just about the last patch (dynamic
enable/disable) and not the whole patchset.
I don't think we're going to be ready for 2.6.24 with these patches. My goal
at this point is to get these three patches, the new unified peer label
access controls and the work Venkat has been doing on flow control into
2.6.25. This should give us plenty of time to get the userspace pieces into
place and perform a decent amount of testing on the whole combination.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-08 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-05 19:32 [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] Added new checks for labeled IPsec & SECMARK [en|dis]able Paul Moore
2007-10-05 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] [SELinux] Add a capabilities bitmap to SELinux policy version 22 Paul Moore
2007-10-10 18:16 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-10-10 18:31 ` Paul Moore
2007-10-10 21:02 ` Eric Paris
2007-10-10 21:41 ` Paul Moore
2007-10-05 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] [SELinux] Better integration between peer labeling subsystems Paul Moore
2007-10-05 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] [SELinux] Enable dynamic enable/disable of the network access checks Paul Moore
2007-10-07 21:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] Added new checks for labeled IPsec & SECMARK [en|dis]able James Morris
2007-10-07 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2007-10-08 12:06 ` Paul Moore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710080806.59404.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.