From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Ingo Molar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:33:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022153343.GA7117@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only
> user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or
> (as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to
> __attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall.
>
> Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that mess?
No, there was only that instance in linkage.h and I just got rid of
it.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@gmail.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Ingo Molar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:33:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022153343.GA7117@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only
> user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or
> (as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to
> __attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall.
>
> Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that mess?
No, there was only that instance in linkage.h and I just got rid of
it.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 22:54 [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final Rob Landley
2007-10-11 22:54 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-20 0:52 ` [uml-devel] " Paolo Giarrusso
2007-10-20 0:52 ` Paolo Giarrusso
2007-10-20 11:41 ` Nix
2007-10-20 11:41 ` Nix
2007-10-21 11:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 11:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 13:08 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-21 13:08 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-21 13:20 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 13:20 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 15:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-21 15:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 4:37 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 4:37 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 5:22 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 5:22 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 6:12 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:12 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:42 ` Nix
2007-10-22 6:42 ` Nix
2007-10-22 6:52 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:52 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-22 6:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-22 7:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 7:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 11:36 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 11:36 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:25 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:25 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:39 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:39 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 15:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 14:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 15:33 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-10-22 15:33 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-22 7:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:27 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 7:27 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 20:24 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-22 20:24 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 15:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 15:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 21:46 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-24 21:46 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071022153343.GA7117@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=p.giarrusso@gmail.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.