From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:11:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023151059.GU30533@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071023144710.GA13785@elte.hu>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:47:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>> You should rename it then to "asmcall" or something.
> > >>>>
> > >>> if then that should be a separate renaming patch.
> > >>>
> > >> Well you're asking for the ugly hacks for out of tree code. [...]
> > >>
> > >
> > > nice word-bending there. I'm asking for pre-existing annotations to
> > > survive. It hurts you _nothing_ and it was a world of pain for us to
> > > recover those lost annotations. Anyway, if Jeremy does not object to the
> > > patch
> >
> > I don't have any objections to the idea of the patch, but I'm still
> > concerned about the practical aspects of it. Maintaining these kinds
> > of annotations is hard/fragile/etc when the compiler doesn't warn when
> > you get it wrong, and only a very specific use-case will reveal the
> > problem (and do so in a fairly obscure way).
>
> it wont be any different from the situation before - we had no such
> warnings there either. Anyway, this shouldnt really bother you as at the
> moment it's only used for -rt. The issue is to keep something we had
> before (but which was stupidly/carelessly removed). If it breaks we'll
> fix it up.
>...
Until recently (read: before 2.6.20) fastcall had a semantics on i386
that resulted in compile errors if you got it wrong.
> Ingo
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@gmail.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:11:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023151059.GU30533@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071023144710.GA13785@elte.hu>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:47:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>> You should rename it then to "asmcall" or something.
> > >>>>
> > >>> if then that should be a separate renaming patch.
> > >>>
> > >> Well you're asking for the ugly hacks for out of tree code. [...]
> > >>
> > >
> > > nice word-bending there. I'm asking for pre-existing annotations to
> > > survive. It hurts you _nothing_ and it was a world of pain for us to
> > > recover those lost annotations. Anyway, if Jeremy does not object to the
> > > patch
> >
> > I don't have any objections to the idea of the patch, but I'm still
> > concerned about the practical aspects of it. Maintaining these kinds
> > of annotations is hard/fragile/etc when the compiler doesn't warn when
> > you get it wrong, and only a very specific use-case will reveal the
> > problem (and do so in a fairly obscure way).
>
> it wont be any different from the situation before - we had no such
> warnings there either. Anyway, this shouldnt really bother you as at the
> moment it's only used for -rt. The issue is to keep something we had
> before (but which was stupidly/carelessly removed). If it breaks we'll
> fix it up.
>...
Until recently (read: before 2.6.20) fastcall had a semantics on i386
that resulted in compile errors if you got it wrong.
> Ingo
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 22:54 [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final Rob Landley
2007-10-11 22:54 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-20 0:52 ` [uml-devel] " Paolo Giarrusso
2007-10-20 0:52 ` Paolo Giarrusso
2007-10-20 11:41 ` Nix
2007-10-20 11:41 ` Nix
2007-10-21 11:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 11:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 13:08 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-21 13:08 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-21 13:20 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 13:20 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-21 15:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-21 15:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 4:37 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 4:37 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 5:22 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 5:22 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 6:12 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:12 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:42 ` Nix
2007-10-22 6:42 ` Nix
2007-10-22 6:52 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:52 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 6:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-22 6:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-22 7:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 7:48 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:58 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 11:36 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 11:36 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:25 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:25 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:39 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:39 ` WANG Cong
2007-10-22 12:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:43 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-22 23:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 23:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:11 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-10-23 15:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 14:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 14:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-23 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-23 14:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 15:33 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-22 15:33 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-22 7:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-10-22 7:27 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 7:27 ` Al Viro
2007-10-22 20:24 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-22 20:24 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 15:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 15:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-24 21:46 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-24 21:46 ` Rob Landley
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-25 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071023151059.GU30533@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=p.giarrusso@gmail.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.