From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Ronis <ronis@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:34:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119163437.GD12494@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195489140.21337.10.camel@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0500, David Ronis wrote:
> The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
> supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
> the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
> that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
> with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
That's not something that the janitors are responsible for. Redirecting
to linux-kernel.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Ronis <ronis@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:34:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119163437.GD12494@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195489140.21337.10.camel@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0500, David Ronis wrote:
> The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
> supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
> the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
> that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
> with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
That's not something that the janitors are responsible for. Redirecting
to linux-kernel.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 16:19 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile David Ronis
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-20 6:36 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071119163437.GD12494@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronis@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.