* 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
@ 2007-11-19 16:19 David Ronis
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-20 6:36 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Ronis @ 2007-11-19 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
Hi
The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
2007-11-19 16:19 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile David Ronis
@ 2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-20 6:36 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2007-11-19 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ronis; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0500, David Ronis wrote:
> The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
> supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
> the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
> that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
> with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
That's not something that the janitors are responsible for. Redirecting
to linux-kernel.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
@ 2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2007-11-19 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ronis; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0500, David Ronis wrote:
> The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
> supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
> the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
> that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
> with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
That's not something that the janitors are responsible for. Redirecting
to linux-kernel.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile
2007-11-19 16:19 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile David Ronis
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2007-11-20 6:36 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2007-11-20 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0500, David Ronis wrote:
> Hi
>
> The current main Makefile incorrectly identified my ld as one that
> supports --build-id (it didn't). The problem is fixed by upgrading to
> the latest binutils, version 2.18, which does, but somehow I suspect
> that this wasn't what was intended. For what it's worth, I was running
> with slackware's binutils-2.17.50.0.17.
Can you narrow it down to the patch that caused this problem?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-20 6:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-19 16:19 2.6.23.1->2.6.23.8 breaks root Makefile David Ronis
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-19 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-20 6:36 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.