From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:01:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102160137.GA21046@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ae72650801020655h6ec31ce8n5cd9014c00c9f6ad@mail.gmail.com>
* Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> > shouldnt we provide a Kconfig way of replacing dev 10:135 with the
> > new driver's 254:0 device? (while keeping all the current modes of
> > operation as well, of course.) It's all supposed to be 100% ioctl
> > ABI compatible with the old driver, right?
>
> It's not compatible enough to "fake" only the old major/minor. Userspace
> must be fixed not to depend on stuff like: /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/183
i think that should be fixed by providing a compatible
/proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq implementation in the new driver too.
> > That way distros could start migrating to it
> > as well, without depending on any udev hackery.
>
> It's in the default udev setup:
> KERNEL=="rtc|rtc0", MODE="0644"
> KERNEL=="rtc0", SYMLINK+="rtc"
but if it breaks max-user-freq (which is needed by qemu for example)
then distros would likely disable it, right?
or this rule might be broken in some way. For example my Fedora 8 box
has this in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:
# miscellaneous
KERNEL=="fuse", MODE="0666"
KERNEL=="rtc|rtc0", MODE="0644"
KERNEL=="rtc0", SYMLINK+="rtc"
still i've got:
crw------- 1 root root 10, 135 Dec 28 08:13 /dev/rtc
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 254, 0 Dec 28 08:13 /dev/rtc0
_and_ my distro kernel doesnt even have CONFIG_RTC enabled - i run the
Fedora 9 devel/rawhide kernel on this box:
# CONFIG_RTC is not set
# CONFIG_GEN_RTC is not set
# CONFIG_HPET_RTC_IRQ is not set
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
# CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DEBUG is not set
# RTC interfaces
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y
# CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST is not set
udev-116-3.fc8. Maybe i just misunderstood what the grand plan was here
- i assumed it was to smoothly convert from old driver to new driver,
without forcing any changes on user-space.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-01 23:32 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080102160137.GA21046@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.