All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:55:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801051255.51144.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801042202070.22169-100000@netrider.rowland.org>

On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > I have rebased gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> > on top of the $subject series, the result is appended.  It has only been
> > compilation tested for now, but I'll be testing it for the next couple of days.
> > 
> > Please review.
> 
> I would prefer it if you could also merge in this patch at the same 
> time:
> 
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html

Makes sense, I will.

> > +void device_resume(void)
> >  {
> > -	sysdev_resume();
> > -	dpm_power_up();
> > +	might_sleep();
> > +	dpm_resume();
> > +	unlock_all_devices();
> > +	unregister_dropped_devices();
> > +	up_write(&pm_sleep_rwsem);
> >  }
> 
> With the aforementioned patch merged in, this will generate a 
> warning for each dropped device.  The call to 
> unregister_dropped_devices() should come after the up_write().
> 
> You might also consider adding a call to unregister_dropped_devices()  
> in the error path of device_suspend() -- in theory even an aborted 
> suspend might cause a device to malfunction.

In fact it already works like this, since device_suspend() now calls the entire
device_resume() on error.

> Otherwise this looks okay.

However, I think we don't need to wait with unregistering suspended devices
until after the other ones are resumed.  We only need a special function for
unregistering suspended devices that will make the PM core release the device's
semaphore before unregistering it.

I have already sent a replacemet for
gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch that includes
some code from the $subject patch and implements the above idea:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/4/278

I'm going to merge it with your patch at:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html
and with patches [2/4] and [4/4] from the $subject series.  I'll post the
result for a review later today.

Thanks,
Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-05 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41     ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:41     ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29           ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05  3:11           ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05  3:11           ` Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 11:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-01-04 22:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:50       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 10:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 12:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56         ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-03 10:56         ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 13:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 14:55       ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 16:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:54           ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:54             ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05             ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:05               ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:12               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:12                 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34                 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:34                 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:34                   ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:05             ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:14             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:29               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:54           ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 14:55       ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 17:26       ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26       ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26         ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 12:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12  0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:49   ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:49     ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:56     ` Greg KH
2008-01-12  3:11       ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12  3:11       ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12  3:11         ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12  3:15         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12  3:15         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12  3:21         ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  3:21           ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  4:29         ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12  4:29         ` Greg KH
2008-01-12  0:56     ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12  0:49   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200801051255.51144.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.