From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Kexec command line length
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:16:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131071625.GA11164@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130214551.GC15415@redhat.com>
* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> [2008-01-30 22:45]:
>
> No. 2.04 is really old. As per boot.txt, it was introduced in 2.6.14.
>
> Anyway, thinking about it more, Large command lines were introduced in
> 2.6.21 kernel (for both i386 and x86_64). cmdline_size was introduced
> in 2.6.22 (for both i386 and x86_64). So how about following test
> condition for both the arch.
>
> if (boot_protocol >= 2.06)
> error message based on cmdline_size field
> else
> Warn user if command line is more than 256 but continue to work.
> Let the user know that it is not known if kernel being loaded
> supports command line size greater than 256. Command line will
> be truncated by destination kernel if it does not support large
> command lines. User is taking a chance
Yes, I also think that's sufficient.
Bernhard
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-14 13:43 Kexec command line length Neil Horman
2008-01-14 14:50 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-01-14 15:40 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-15 15:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-15 17:09 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-15 17:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-25 12:35 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-25 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-25 15:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-25 19:50 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-25 19:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-25 20:11 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-25 20:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-25 20:54 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-28 17:08 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-28 19:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-28 20:07 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-28 20:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-28 20:53 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-28 21:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-28 21:29 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-01-29 1:01 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-29 15:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-29 18:17 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-01-29 18:52 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-29 19:57 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-30 20:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-30 20:59 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-30 21:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-30 21:18 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-30 21:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-31 0:10 ` Neil Horman
2008-01-31 7:16 ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2008-02-12 21:11 ` Neil Horman
2008-02-18 3:14 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080131071625.GA11164@suse.de \
--to=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.