All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:31:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080205143149.GA4207@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost>

On (04/02/08 13:20), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> > > When the kernel behaviour changes and breaks user space then the kernel
> > > is usually wrong. Cc'ed Lee S. who maintains the kernel code now.
> 
> The memoryless nodes patch series changed a lot of things, so just
> reverting this one area [mpol_check_policy()] probably won't restore the
> prior behavior.  A fully populated node mask is not necessarily a proper
> subset of node_online_map().  And contextualize_policy() also requires
> the mask to be a subset of mems_allowed which also defaults to nodes
> with memory.
> 
> I don't know how Mel Gorman's "two zonelist" series, which is still
> awaiting a window into the -mm tree, affects this behavior.  Those
> patches will certainly be affected by whatever we decide here.
> 

I doubt they'd make a difference to this particular problem.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:31:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080205143149.GA4207@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost>

On (04/02/08 13:20), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> > > When the kernel behaviour changes and breaks user space then the kernel
> > > is usually wrong. Cc'ed Lee S. who maintains the kernel code now.
> 
> The memoryless nodes patch series changed a lot of things, so just
> reverting this one area [mpol_check_policy()] probably won't restore the
> prior behavior.  A fully populated node mask is not necessarily a proper
> subset of node_online_map().  And contextualize_policy() also requires
> the mask to be a subset of mems_allowed which also defaults to nodes
> with memory.
> 
> I don't know how Mel Gorman's "two zonelist" series, which is still
> awaiting a window into the -mm tree, affects this behavior.  Those
> patches will certainly be affected by whatever we decide here.
> 

I doubt they'd make a difference to this particular problem.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-05 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-02  8:12 [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  8:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02  9:09   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02  9:37   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  9:37     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 11:30     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 11:30       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-04 19:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 19:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 18:20     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-04 18:20       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05  9:26       ` [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05  9:26         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 21:57         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:12           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-06 16:00             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:15           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-06  2:17           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-06 16:11             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-06  6:49           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-06 17:38         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-07  8:31           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-08 19:45         ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-08 19:45           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-09 18:11           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-09 18:11             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:29             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:49             ` Greg KH
2008-02-10  5:49               ` Greg KH
2008-02-10  7:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10  7:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 10:31                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-10 10:31                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-11 16:47                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-11 16:47                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12  0:43                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  1:00                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  1:56                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  2:05                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  3:05                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  3:17                             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 15:08                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 19:06                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  0:07                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13  0:42                             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 16:32                               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 18:32                                 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 18:56                                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12  4:30                   ` [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  4:30                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  5:06                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  5:06                       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  5:07                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12  5:07                       ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 13:18                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 13:18                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 10:17       ` [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 10:17         ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 11:14         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 11:14           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 19:56         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 19:56           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:51           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:51             ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:03             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:03               ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:33               ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:33                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:04                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:04                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:44                   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:44                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:50                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:50                     ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 14:31       ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2008-02-05 14:31         ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 15:23         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 15:23           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:12           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:12             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:27             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:27               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 19:04               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:04                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:15                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 19:15                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:06                   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:06                     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080205143149.GA4207@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.