From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:49:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210054953.GA10371@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080210141154.25E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:29:24PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> CC'd Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
>
> I tested this patch on fujitsu memoryless node.
> (2.6.24 + silently-restrict-nodemask-to-allowed-nodes-V3 insted 2.6.24-mm1)
> it seems works good.
>
> Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
>
> Greg, I hope this patch merge to 2.6.24.x stable tree because
> this patch is regression fixed patch.
> Please tell me what do i doing for it.
Once the patch goes into Linus's tree, feel free to send it to the
stable@kernel.org address so that we can include it in the 2.6.24.x
tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:49:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210054953.GA10371@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080210141154.25E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:29:24PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> CC'd Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
>
> I tested this patch on fujitsu memoryless node.
> (2.6.24 + silently-restrict-nodemask-to-allowed-nodes-V3 insted 2.6.24-mm1)
> it seems works good.
>
> Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
>
> Greg, I hope this patch merge to 2.6.24.x stable tree because
> this patch is regression fixed patch.
> Please tell me what do i doing for it.
Once the patch goes into Linus's tree, feel free to send it to the
stable@kernel.org address so that we can include it in the 2.6.24.x
tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-02 8:12 [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 8:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 9:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 9:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-04 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 18:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-04 18:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 9:26 ` [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 9:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 21:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-06 16:00 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-06 2:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-06 16:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-06 6:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-06 17:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-07 8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-08 19:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-08 19:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-09 18:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-09 18:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:49 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-02-10 5:49 ` Greg KH
2008-02-10 7:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 7:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 10:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-10 10:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-11 16:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-11 16:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 0:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 1:00 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 1:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 2:05 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 3:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 3:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 15:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 19:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 0:07 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 0:42 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 16:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 18:32 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 18:56 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 4:30 ` [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 5:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 5:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 13:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 13:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 10:17 ` [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 10:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 11:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 11:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:51 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:51 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:44 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:44 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:50 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:50 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 15:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 15:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 19:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:06 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080210054953.GA10371@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.