From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] kgdb-light -v10
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:10:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212171028.GC4191@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B1C76F.6070908@windriver.com>
> It is more than a simple recursion check (which is already in the code)
> because there are some conditions we can recover from. I'd rather not
> crash the system out if it can be recovered.
Ok I'm trying to understand the code as you describe it. As far
as I can see (in kgdb-light-v10) it is:
+ addr = kgdb_arch_pc(ks->ex_vector, ks->linux_regs);
+ kgdb_deactivate_sw_breakpoints();
+
+ /*
+ * If the break point removed ok at the place exception
+ * occurred, try to recover and print a warning to the end
+ * user because the user planted a breakpoint in a place that
+ * KGDB needs in order to function.
+ */
+ if (kgdb_remove_sw_break(addr) == 0) {
and
+static int kgdb_remove_sw_break(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KGDB_MAX_BREAKPOINTS; i++) {
+ if ((kgdb_break[i].state == BP_SET) &&
+ (kgdb_break[i].bpt_addr == addr)) {
+ kgdb_break[i].state = BP_REMOVED;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ return -ENOENT;
correct?
I don't think that code does what you describe at all. Are you
sure we're talking about the same thing?
There is certainly no real protection against break points in
debugger code in there as far as I can see (except for the reentry
counter)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-11 1:53 kgdb in git-x86#mm review Andi Kleen
2008-02-11 15:32 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-02-11 16:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-11 16:21 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v8, (was: Re: kgdb in git-x86#mm review) Ingo Molnar
2008-02-11 16:41 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v8, Jan Kiszka
2008-02-11 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-11 17:10 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v8, (was: Re: kgdb in git-x86#mm review) Andi Kleen
2008-02-11 23:03 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v9 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 10:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 9:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-12 10:26 ` Roland McGrath
2008-02-12 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 11:27 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v10 Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 12:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 13:30 ` Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 14:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 14:35 ` Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 15:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 16:21 ` Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 17:10 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-02-12 16:48 ` Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 13:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 15:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 16:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 16:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-12 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 17:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 12:35 ` [RFC][PATCH] modular kgdb-light (was: Re: [git pull] kgdb-light -v10) Jan Kiszka
2008-02-15 13:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 20:24 ` [RFC][PATCH] modular kgdb-light Jason Wessel
2008-02-15 20:36 ` [git pull] kgdb-light -v10 Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-12 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 18:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-12 19:22 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 19:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-12 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 19:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-12 19:34 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-02-12 20:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-12 13:18 ` Domenico Andreoli
2008-02-12 13:59 ` Jason Wessel
2008-02-12 15:45 ` Domenico Andreoli
2008-02-11 16:03 ` kgdb in git-x86#mm review Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080212171028.GC4191@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.