All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch 08/21] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:29:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080228192928.566747790@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080228192908.126720629@redhat.com

[-- Attachment #1: rvr-04-linux-2.6-scan-ratio-fixes.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7782 bytes --]

The access ratio based scan rate determination in get_scan_ratio
works ok in most situations, but needs to be corrected in some
corner cases:
- if we run out of swap space, do not bother scanning the anon LRUs
- if we have already freed all of the page cache, we need to scan
  the anon LRUs
- restore the *actual* access ratio based scan rate algorithm, the
  previous versions of this patch series had the wrong version
- scale the number of pages added to zone->nr_scan[l]

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -906,8 +906,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON,
 						-count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON]);
 
-		if (scan_global_lru(sc))
+		if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 			zone->pages_scanned += nr_scan;
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon += count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] +
+						     count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
+			zone->recent_scanned_file += count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] +
+						     count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
+		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 
 		nr_scanned += nr_scan;
@@ -957,11 +962,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
 			VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
 			SetPageLRU(page);
 			list_del(&page->lru);
-			if (page_file_cache(page)) {
+			if (page_file_cache(page))
 				lru += LRU_FILE;
-				zone->recent_rotated_file++;
-			} else {
-				zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
+			if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
+				if (page_file_cache(page))
+					zone->recent_rotated_file++;
+				else
+					zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
 			}
 			if (PageActive(page))
 				lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
@@ -1040,8 +1047,13 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
 	 * zone->pages_scanned is used for detect zone's oom
 	 * mem_cgroup remembers nr_scan by itself.
 	 */
-	if (scan_global_lru(sc))
+	if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
+		if (file)
+			zone->recent_scanned_file += pgscanned;
+		else
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon += pgscanned;
+	}
 	if (file)
 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -pgmoved);
 	else
@@ -1182,9 +1194,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lr
 static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control * sc,
 					unsigned long *percent)
 {
-	unsigned long anon, file;
+	unsigned long anon, file, free;
 	unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio;
-	unsigned long rotate_sum;
 	unsigned long ap, fp;
 
 	anon  = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
@@ -1192,15 +1203,19 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *
 	file  = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
 		zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
 
-	rotate_sum = zone->recent_rotated_file + zone->recent_rotated_anon;
-
 	/* Keep a floating average of RECENT references. */
-	if (unlikely(rotate_sum > min(anon, file))) {
+	if (unlikely(zone->recent_scanned_anon > anon / zone->inactive_ratio)) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-		zone->recent_rotated_file /= 2;
+		zone->recent_scanned_anon /= 2;
 		zone->recent_rotated_anon /= 2;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-		rotate_sum /= 2;
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely(zone->recent_scanned_file > file / 4)) {
+		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+		zone->recent_scanned_file /= 2;
+		zone->recent_rotated_file /= 2;
+		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1213,23 +1228,33 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *
 	/*
 	 *                  anon       recent_rotated_anon
 	 * %anon = 100 * ----------- / ------------------- * IO cost
-	 *               anon + file       rotate_sum
+	 *               anon + file   recent_scanned_anon
 	 */
-	ap = (anon_prio * anon) / (anon + file + 1);
-	ap *= rotate_sum / (zone->recent_rotated_anon + 1);
-	if (ap == 0)
-		ap = 1;
-	else if (ap > 100)
-		ap = 100;
-	percent[0] = ap;
-
-	fp = (file_prio * file) / (anon + file + 1);
-	fp *= rotate_sum / (zone->recent_rotated_file + 1);
-	if (fp == 0)
-		fp = 1;
-	else if (fp > 100)
-		fp = 100;
-	percent[1] = fp;
+	ap = (anon_prio + 1) * (zone->recent_scanned_anon + 1);
+	ap /= zone->recent_rotated_anon + 1;
+
+	fp = (file_prio + 1) * (zone->recent_scanned_file + 1);
+	fp /= zone->recent_rotated_file + 1;
+
+	/* Normalize to percentages */
+	percent[0] = 100 * ap / (ap + fp + 1);
+	percent[1] = 100 - percent[0];
+
+	free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages.
+	 */
+	if (nr_swap_pages <= 0) {
+		percent[0] = 0;
+		percent[1] = 100;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * If we already freed most file pages, scan the anon pages
+	 * regardless of the page access ratios or swappiness setting.
+	 */
+	else if (file + free <= zone->pages_high)
+		percent[0] = 100;
 }
 
 
@@ -1250,13 +1275,17 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
 	for_each_lru(l) {
 		if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 			int file = is_file_lru(l);
+			int scan;
 			/*
 			 * Add one to nr_to_scan just to make sure that the
-			 * kernel will slowly sift through the active list.
+			 * kernel will slowly sift through each list.
 			 */
-			zone->nr_scan[l] += (zone_page_state(zone,
-				NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l) >> priority) + 1;
-			nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100;
+			scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l);
+			scan >>= priority;
+			scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
+
+			zone->nr_scan[l] += scan + 1;
+			nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l];
 			if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
 				zone->nr_scan[l] = 0;
 			else
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mmzone.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mmzone.h	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ struct zone {
 
 	unsigned long		recent_rotated_anon;
 	unsigned long		recent_rotated_file;
+	unsigned long		recent_scanned_anon;
+	unsigned long		recent_scanned_file;
 
 	unsigned long		pages_scanned;	   /* since last reclaim */
 	unsigned long		flags;		   /* zone flags, see below */
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/page_alloc.c	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -3478,7 +3478,8 @@ static void __meminit free_area_init_cor
 		}
 		zone->recent_rotated_anon = 0;
 		zone->recent_rotated_file = 0;
-//TODO recent_scanned_* ???
+		zone->recent_scanned_anon = 0;
+		zone->recent_scanned_file = 0;
 		zap_zone_vm_stats(zone);
 		zone->flags = 0;
 		if (!size)
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/swap.c	2008-02-28 00:27:06.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 	if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page)) {
-		int lru = LRU_BASE;
-		lru += page_file_cache(page);
+		int file = page_file_cache(page);
+		int lru = LRU_BASE + file;
 		del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
 
 		SetPageActive(page);
@@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
 		add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
 		__count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
 		mem_cgroup_move_lists(page_get_page_cgroup(page), true);
+
+		if (file) {
+			zone->recent_scanned_file++;
+			zone->recent_rotated_file++;
+		} else {
+			/* Can this happen?  Maybe through tmpfs... */
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon++;
+			zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
+		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 }

-- 
All Rights Reversed


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch 08/21] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:29:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080228192928.566747790@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080228192908.126720629@redhat.com

[-- Attachment #1: rvr-04-linux-2.6-scan-ratio-fixes.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8007 bytes --]

The access ratio based scan rate determination in get_scan_ratio
works ok in most situations, but needs to be corrected in some
corner cases:
- if we run out of swap space, do not bother scanning the anon LRUs
- if we have already freed all of the page cache, we need to scan
  the anon LRUs
- restore the *actual* access ratio based scan rate algorithm, the
  previous versions of this patch series had the wrong version
- scale the number of pages added to zone->nr_scan[l]

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -906,8 +906,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON,
 						-count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON]);
 
-		if (scan_global_lru(sc))
+		if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 			zone->pages_scanned += nr_scan;
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon += count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] +
+						     count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
+			zone->recent_scanned_file += count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] +
+						     count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
+		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 
 		nr_scanned += nr_scan;
@@ -957,11 +962,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
 			VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
 			SetPageLRU(page);
 			list_del(&page->lru);
-			if (page_file_cache(page)) {
+			if (page_file_cache(page))
 				lru += LRU_FILE;
-				zone->recent_rotated_file++;
-			} else {
-				zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
+			if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
+				if (page_file_cache(page))
+					zone->recent_rotated_file++;
+				else
+					zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
 			}
 			if (PageActive(page))
 				lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
@@ -1040,8 +1047,13 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
 	 * zone->pages_scanned is used for detect zone's oom
 	 * mem_cgroup remembers nr_scan by itself.
 	 */
-	if (scan_global_lru(sc))
+	if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
+		if (file)
+			zone->recent_scanned_file += pgscanned;
+		else
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon += pgscanned;
+	}
 	if (file)
 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -pgmoved);
 	else
@@ -1182,9 +1194,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lr
 static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control * sc,
 					unsigned long *percent)
 {
-	unsigned long anon, file;
+	unsigned long anon, file, free;
 	unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio;
-	unsigned long rotate_sum;
 	unsigned long ap, fp;
 
 	anon  = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
@@ -1192,15 +1203,19 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *
 	file  = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
 		zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
 
-	rotate_sum = zone->recent_rotated_file + zone->recent_rotated_anon;
-
 	/* Keep a floating average of RECENT references. */
-	if (unlikely(rotate_sum > min(anon, file))) {
+	if (unlikely(zone->recent_scanned_anon > anon / zone->inactive_ratio)) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-		zone->recent_rotated_file /= 2;
+		zone->recent_scanned_anon /= 2;
 		zone->recent_rotated_anon /= 2;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-		rotate_sum /= 2;
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely(zone->recent_scanned_file > file / 4)) {
+		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+		zone->recent_scanned_file /= 2;
+		zone->recent_rotated_file /= 2;
+		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1213,23 +1228,33 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *
 	/*
 	 *                  anon       recent_rotated_anon
 	 * %anon = 100 * ----------- / ------------------- * IO cost
-	 *               anon + file       rotate_sum
+	 *               anon + file   recent_scanned_anon
 	 */
-	ap = (anon_prio * anon) / (anon + file + 1);
-	ap *= rotate_sum / (zone->recent_rotated_anon + 1);
-	if (ap == 0)
-		ap = 1;
-	else if (ap > 100)
-		ap = 100;
-	percent[0] = ap;
-
-	fp = (file_prio * file) / (anon + file + 1);
-	fp *= rotate_sum / (zone->recent_rotated_file + 1);
-	if (fp == 0)
-		fp = 1;
-	else if (fp > 100)
-		fp = 100;
-	percent[1] = fp;
+	ap = (anon_prio + 1) * (zone->recent_scanned_anon + 1);
+	ap /= zone->recent_rotated_anon + 1;
+
+	fp = (file_prio + 1) * (zone->recent_scanned_file + 1);
+	fp /= zone->recent_rotated_file + 1;
+
+	/* Normalize to percentages */
+	percent[0] = 100 * ap / (ap + fp + 1);
+	percent[1] = 100 - percent[0];
+
+	free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages.
+	 */
+	if (nr_swap_pages <= 0) {
+		percent[0] = 0;
+		percent[1] = 100;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * If we already freed most file pages, scan the anon pages
+	 * regardless of the page access ratios or swappiness setting.
+	 */
+	else if (file + free <= zone->pages_high)
+		percent[0] = 100;
 }
 
 
@@ -1250,13 +1275,17 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
 	for_each_lru(l) {
 		if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
 			int file = is_file_lru(l);
+			int scan;
 			/*
 			 * Add one to nr_to_scan just to make sure that the
-			 * kernel will slowly sift through the active list.
+			 * kernel will slowly sift through each list.
 			 */
-			zone->nr_scan[l] += (zone_page_state(zone,
-				NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l) >> priority) + 1;
-			nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100;
+			scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l);
+			scan >>= priority;
+			scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
+
+			zone->nr_scan[l] += scan + 1;
+			nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l];
 			if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
 				zone->nr_scan[l] = 0;
 			else
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mmzone.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/include/linux/mmzone.h	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ struct zone {
 
 	unsigned long		recent_rotated_anon;
 	unsigned long		recent_rotated_file;
+	unsigned long		recent_scanned_anon;
+	unsigned long		recent_scanned_file;
 
 	unsigned long		pages_scanned;	   /* since last reclaim */
 	unsigned long		flags;		   /* zone flags, see below */
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/page_alloc.c	2008-02-28 00:29:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -3478,7 +3478,8 @@ static void __meminit free_area_init_cor
 		}
 		zone->recent_rotated_anon = 0;
 		zone->recent_rotated_file = 0;
-//TODO recent_scanned_* ???
+		zone->recent_scanned_anon = 0;
+		zone->recent_scanned_file = 0;
 		zap_zone_vm_stats(zone);
 		zone->flags = 0;
 		if (!size)
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/swap.c	2008-02-28 00:27:06.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap.c	2008-02-28 00:29:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 	if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page)) {
-		int lru = LRU_BASE;
-		lru += page_file_cache(page);
+		int file = page_file_cache(page);
+		int lru = LRU_BASE + file;
 		del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
 
 		SetPageActive(page);
@@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ void activate_page(struct page *page)
 		add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
 		__count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
 		mem_cgroup_move_lists(page_get_page_cgroup(page), true);
+
+		if (file) {
+			zone->recent_scanned_file++;
+			zone->recent_rotated_file++;
+		} else {
+			/* Can this happen?  Maybe through tmpfs... */
+			zone->recent_scanned_anon++;
+			zone->recent_rotated_anon++;
+		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 }

-- 
All Rights Reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-28 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-28 19:29 [patch 00/21] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 01/21] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29  2:29   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-29  2:29     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-29  2:41     ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29  2:41       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29  2:47       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-29  2:47         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 02/21] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 16:03   ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-02-29 16:03     ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-03 18:57     ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 18:57       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 03/21] use an array for the LRU pagevecs Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 15:40   ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-02-29 15:40     ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-01  7:02     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01  7:02       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 11:04       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 11:04         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 20:38         ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 20:38           ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-05  1:38           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-05  1:38             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 04/21] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:05   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 20:05     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 20:20     ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:20       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 05/21] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 11:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-29 11:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 06/21] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-01 12:13   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01 12:13     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01 12:46   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01 12:46     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 07/21] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 10:50   ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-03-03 10:50     ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-02-28 19:29 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2008-02-28 19:29   ` [patch 08/21] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 10:40   ` minchan Kim
2008-03-04 10:40     ` minchan Kim
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 09/21] (NEW) improve reclaim balancing Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-01 13:35   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01 13:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-03 19:26     ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 19:26       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 10/21] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-02 10:35   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-02 10:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-02 14:23     ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-02 14:23       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
     [not found]   ` <44c63dc40802282058h67f7597bvb614575f06c62e2c@mail.gmail.com>
2008-02-29 14:48     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:48       ` Lee Schermerhorn
     [not found]       ` <44c63dc40803021904n5de681datba400e08079c152d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-03  3:06         ` minchan Kim
2008-03-03  3:06           ` minchan Kim
2008-03-03 18:46         ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 18:46           ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 23:38           ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-03-03 23:38             ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-03-04  1:55             ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04  1:55               ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 10:46   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 10:46     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 15:05     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-04 15:05       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-04 21:21       ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 21:21         ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-05  1:42       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-05  1:42         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 13/21] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 14/21] scan noreclaim list for reclaimable pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 23:41   ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-28 23:41     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-29 14:38     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:38       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 15/21] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 16/21] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 17/21] non-reclaimable mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
     [not found]   ` <44c63dc40802282055q508af6ccsb0e8ac3fb5e67d24@mail.gmail.com>
2008-02-29 14:47     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:47       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 18/21] mlock vma pages under mmap_sem held for read Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 19/21] handle mlocked pages during map/unmap and truncate Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 20/21] account mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 21/21] cull non-reclaimable anon pages from the LRU at fault time Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:19   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 20:19     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 22:27     ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 22:27       ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:49 ` [patch 00/21] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:49   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:14 ` John Stoffel
2008-02-28 20:14   ` John Stoffel
2008-02-28 20:23   ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:23     ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080228192928.566747790@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.