From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: htejun@gmail.com
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
efault@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:52:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080302235223X.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C8F4FC.1040505@gmail.com>
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:17:32 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Jens, James.
>
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> With the original patch, I have to run through the whole of libsas and
> >> scsi_transport_sas doing
> >>
> >> s/data_len/raw_data_len/
> >>
> >> With your update it looks like I have to run through them all doing
> >>
> >> s/data_len/data_len - extra_len/
>
> blk_rq_raw_data_len() should do.
>
> >> which is even worse. Can't we put things back to a point where data_len
> >> means exactly that and extra_len means how much we have spare on the
> >> end, so you know you can DMA up to data_len + extra_len if need be?
> >>
> >> That way we don't have to sweep through every block driver altering the
> >> way it uses data_len.
>
> If SMP is broken because it needs start address alignment but not
> padding to align the size, what should be done is to make that exact
> requirement visible to the block layer. Say,
> blk_queue_dma_start_alignment() or maybe change
> blk_queue_dma_alignment() such that it only indicates start address
> alignment and add blk_queue_dma_size_alignment() for drivers which
> require size to be aligned too. I think those are few.
>
> I think the decision which value rq->data_len represents comes down to
> which size is used more in low level drivers because no matter which way
> we choose we'll have to update some of the drivers which expects the
> other thing from rq->data_len.
>
> blk_rq_raw_data_len() is needed iff a driver needs dummy buffers
> attached at the end and still needs to know the original request size
> which isn't the common case.
>
> > Fully agree. The reason why I think it's so ugly is that you have to
> > keep these two seperate variables in sync. The burning was just one bug,
> > there will be others...
>
> The posted modification isn't too bad as the maintenance of the two
> variables is at places where the nasty things happen. I think what
> rq->data_len should represent when seen from LLDs is more important and
> please note that if SMP is broken because it simply doesn't require
> 512byte size alignment, it's a different issue.
>
> As long as both raw_data_len and data_len are accessible, I'm okay
> either way. My biggest reluctance is against breaking sum(sg) ==
> rq->data_len. I think this can lead to much more subtle problems such
> as programming the controller w/ wrong bytes count and wrapped-around
> resid calculation.
sum(sg) == rq->data_len is already broken; sg sends such requests
(though it would be nice if it doesn't).
I've not followed the earlier discussion (because I thought the drain
buffer stuff affected only libata but seems it doesn't ...). Why did
we need to change the meaning of rq->data_len?
rq->data_len meant the true data length and the patch to change it
doesn't look to make anything simple. Can we revert the meaning of
rq->data_len? I'm not sure that we need to add rq->extra_len but it's
fine as long as it's only for drivers that want to use it.
This is only compile tested.
=
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 775c851..bfec406 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
rq->nr_hw_segments = 0;
rq->ioprio = 0;
rq->special = NULL;
- rq->raw_data_len = 0;
rq->buffer = NULL;
rq->tag = -1;
rq->errors = 0;
@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
rq->cmd_len = 0;
memset(rq->cmd, 0, sizeof(rq->cmd));
rq->data_len = 0;
+ rq->extra_len = 0;
rq->sense_len = 0;
rq->data = NULL;
rq->sense = NULL;
@@ -2016,7 +2016,6 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
rq->hard_nr_sectors = rq->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
rq->buffer = bio_data(bio);
- rq->raw_data_len = bio->bi_size;
rq->data_len = bio->bi_size;
rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 09f7fd0..3287637 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
rq->biotail->bi_next = bio;
rq->biotail = bio;
- rq->raw_data_len += bio->bi_size;
rq->data_len += bio->bi_size;
}
return 0;
@@ -155,7 +154,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_user(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1].bv_len += pad_len;
bio->bi_size += pad_len;
- rq->data_len += pad_len;
+ rq->extra_len += pad_len;
}
rq->buffer = rq->data = NULL;
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 7506c4f..0f58616 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ new_segment:
((unsigned long)q->dma_drain_buffer) &
(PAGE_SIZE - 1));
nsegs++;
- rq->data_len += q->dma_drain_size;
+ rq->extra_len += q->dma_drain_size;
}
if (sg)
diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index 7f3c095..8917c51 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -437,14 +437,14 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
}
if (rq->next_rq) {
- hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
- hdr->din_resid = rq->next_rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->dout_resid = rq->data_len;
+ hdr->din_resid = rq->next_rq->data_len;
blk_rq_unmap_user(bidi_bio);
blk_put_request(rq->next_rq);
} else if (rq_data_dir(rq) == READ)
- hdr->din_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->din_resid = rq->data_len;
else
- hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->dout_resid = rq->data_len;
/*
* If the request generated a negative error number, return it
diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index e993cac..a2c3a93 100644
--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sghdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_hdr *hdr,
hdr->info = 0;
if (hdr->masked_status || hdr->host_status || hdr->driver_status)
hdr->info |= SG_INFO_CHECK;
- hdr->resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->resid = rq->data_len;
hdr->sb_len_wr = 0;
if (rq->sense_len && hdr->sbp) {
@@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ static int __blk_send_generic(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
rq = blk_get_request(q, WRITE, __GFP_WAIT);
rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
rq->data = NULL;
- rq->raw_data_len = 0;
rq->data_len = 0;
+ rq->extra_len = 0;
rq->timeout = BLK_DEFAULT_SG_TIMEOUT;
memset(rq->cmd, 0, sizeof(rq->cmd));
rq->cmd[0] = cmd;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 7b1f1ee..fe47922 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -2538,7 +2538,7 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
}
qc->tf.command = ATA_CMD_PACKET;
- qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd);
+ qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd) + scmd->request->extra_len;
/* check whether ATAPI DMA is safe */
if (!using_pio && ata_check_atapi_dma(qc))
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
* want to set it properly, and for DMA where it is
* effectively meaningless.
*/
- nbytes = min(scmd->request->raw_data_len, (unsigned int)63 * 1024);
+ nbytes = min(scmd->request->data_len, (unsigned int)63 * 1024);
/* Most ATAPI devices which honor transfer chunk size don't
* behave according to the spec when odd chunk size which
@@ -2875,7 +2875,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
* TODO: find out if we need to do more here to
* cover scatter/gather case.
*/
- qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd);
+ qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd) + scmd->request->extra_len;
/* request result TF and be quiet about device error */
qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF | ATA_QCFLAG_QUIET;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 6fe67d1..b72526c 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ struct request {
unsigned int cmd_len;
unsigned char cmd[BLK_MAX_CDB];
- unsigned int raw_data_len;
unsigned int data_len;
+ unsigned int extra_len; /* length of alignment and padding */
unsigned int sense_len;
void *data;
void *sense;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: htejun@gmail.com
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
efault@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:52:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080302235223X.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C8F4FC.1040505@gmail.com>
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:17:32 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Jens, James.
>
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> With the original patch, I have to run through the whole of libsas and
> >> scsi_transport_sas doing
> >>
> >> s/data_len/raw_data_len/
> >>
> >> With your update it looks like I have to run through them all doing
> >>
> >> s/data_len/data_len - extra_len/
>
> blk_rq_raw_data_len() should do.
>
> >> which is even worse. Can't we put things back to a point where data_len
> >> means exactly that and extra_len means how much we have spare on the
> >> end, so you know you can DMA up to data_len + extra_len if need be?
> >>
> >> That way we don't have to sweep through every block driver altering the
> >> way it uses data_len.
>
> If SMP is broken because it needs start address alignment but not
> padding to align the size, what should be done is to make that exact
> requirement visible to the block layer. Say,
> blk_queue_dma_start_alignment() or maybe change
> blk_queue_dma_alignment() such that it only indicates start address
> alignment and add blk_queue_dma_size_alignment() for drivers which
> require size to be aligned too. I think those are few.
>
> I think the decision which value rq->data_len represents comes down to
> which size is used more in low level drivers because no matter which way
> we choose we'll have to update some of the drivers which expects the
> other thing from rq->data_len.
>
> blk_rq_raw_data_len() is needed iff a driver needs dummy buffers
> attached at the end and still needs to know the original request size
> which isn't the common case.
>
> > Fully agree. The reason why I think it's so ugly is that you have to
> > keep these two seperate variables in sync. The burning was just one bug,
> > there will be others...
>
> The posted modification isn't too bad as the maintenance of the two
> variables is at places where the nasty things happen. I think what
> rq->data_len should represent when seen from LLDs is more important and
> please note that if SMP is broken because it simply doesn't require
> 512byte size alignment, it's a different issue.
>
> As long as both raw_data_len and data_len are accessible, I'm okay
> either way. My biggest reluctance is against breaking sum(sg) ==
> rq->data_len. I think this can lead to much more subtle problems such
> as programming the controller w/ wrong bytes count and wrapped-around
> resid calculation.
sum(sg) == rq->data_len is already broken; sg sends such requests
(though it would be nice if it doesn't).
I've not followed the earlier discussion (because I thought the drain
buffer stuff affected only libata but seems it doesn't ...). Why did
we need to change the meaning of rq->data_len?
rq->data_len meant the true data length and the patch to change it
doesn't look to make anything simple. Can we revert the meaning of
rq->data_len? I'm not sure that we need to add rq->extra_len but it's
fine as long as it's only for drivers that want to use it.
This is only compile tested.
=
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 775c851..bfec406 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
rq->nr_hw_segments = 0;
rq->ioprio = 0;
rq->special = NULL;
- rq->raw_data_len = 0;
rq->buffer = NULL;
rq->tag = -1;
rq->errors = 0;
@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
rq->cmd_len = 0;
memset(rq->cmd, 0, sizeof(rq->cmd));
rq->data_len = 0;
+ rq->extra_len = 0;
rq->sense_len = 0;
rq->data = NULL;
rq->sense = NULL;
@@ -2016,7 +2016,6 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
rq->hard_nr_sectors = rq->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
rq->buffer = bio_data(bio);
- rq->raw_data_len = bio->bi_size;
rq->data_len = bio->bi_size;
rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 09f7fd0..3287637 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
rq->biotail->bi_next = bio;
rq->biotail = bio;
- rq->raw_data_len += bio->bi_size;
rq->data_len += bio->bi_size;
}
return 0;
@@ -155,7 +154,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_user(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1].bv_len += pad_len;
bio->bi_size += pad_len;
- rq->data_len += pad_len;
+ rq->extra_len += pad_len;
}
rq->buffer = rq->data = NULL;
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 7506c4f..0f58616 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ new_segment:
((unsigned long)q->dma_drain_buffer) &
(PAGE_SIZE - 1));
nsegs++;
- rq->data_len += q->dma_drain_size;
+ rq->extra_len += q->dma_drain_size;
}
if (sg)
diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index 7f3c095..8917c51 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -437,14 +437,14 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
}
if (rq->next_rq) {
- hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
- hdr->din_resid = rq->next_rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->dout_resid = rq->data_len;
+ hdr->din_resid = rq->next_rq->data_len;
blk_rq_unmap_user(bidi_bio);
blk_put_request(rq->next_rq);
} else if (rq_data_dir(rq) == READ)
- hdr->din_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->din_resid = rq->data_len;
else
- hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->dout_resid = rq->data_len;
/*
* If the request generated a negative error number, return it
diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index e993cac..a2c3a93 100644
--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sghdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_hdr *hdr,
hdr->info = 0;
if (hdr->masked_status || hdr->host_status || hdr->driver_status)
hdr->info |= SG_INFO_CHECK;
- hdr->resid = rq->raw_data_len;
+ hdr->resid = rq->data_len;
hdr->sb_len_wr = 0;
if (rq->sense_len && hdr->sbp) {
@@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ static int __blk_send_generic(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
rq = blk_get_request(q, WRITE, __GFP_WAIT);
rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
rq->data = NULL;
- rq->raw_data_len = 0;
rq->data_len = 0;
+ rq->extra_len = 0;
rq->timeout = BLK_DEFAULT_SG_TIMEOUT;
memset(rq->cmd, 0, sizeof(rq->cmd));
rq->cmd[0] = cmd;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 7b1f1ee..fe47922 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -2538,7 +2538,7 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
}
qc->tf.command = ATA_CMD_PACKET;
- qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd);
+ qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd) + scmd->request->extra_len;
/* check whether ATAPI DMA is safe */
if (!using_pio && ata_check_atapi_dma(qc))
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
* want to set it properly, and for DMA where it is
* effectively meaningless.
*/
- nbytes = min(scmd->request->raw_data_len, (unsigned int)63 * 1024);
+ nbytes = min(scmd->request->data_len, (unsigned int)63 * 1024);
/* Most ATAPI devices which honor transfer chunk size don't
* behave according to the spec when odd chunk size which
@@ -2875,7 +2875,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
* TODO: find out if we need to do more here to
* cover scatter/gather case.
*/
- qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd);
+ qc->nbytes = scsi_bufflen(scmd) + scmd->request->extra_len;
/* request result TF and be quiet about device error */
qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF | ATA_QCFLAG_QUIET;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 6fe67d1..b72526c 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ struct request {
unsigned int cmd_len;
unsigned char cmd[BLK_MAX_CDB];
- unsigned int raw_data_len;
unsigned int data_len;
+ unsigned int extra_len; /* length of alignment and padding */
unsigned int sense_len;
void *data;
void *sense;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-02 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-21 8:42 regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke Mike Galbraith
2008-02-22 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-23 7:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-24 7:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 9:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 13:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-26 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-27 0:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-27 2:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 2:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-27 7:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-28 7:43 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-28 8:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-28 8:50 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Tejun Heo
2008-02-28 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-28 15:46 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-29 16:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-29 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-01 6:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-01 15:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-02 14:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2008-03-02 14:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-02 18:46 ` Mike Christie
2008-03-03 3:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-03 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 3:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 6:10 ` [PATCH] block: separate out padding from alignment Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 18:27 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-03 8:26 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 9:21 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 12:17 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 12:17 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 13:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 13:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 14:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 14:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 14:22 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-03 14:52 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-03 22:44 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 2:11 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 2:32 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 8:53 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 8:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 9:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:22 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 9:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 12:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 12:39 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 12:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 12:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 13:03 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 14:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:45 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 18:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 18:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:28 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 16:04 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-04 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 17:34 ` walt
2008-03-04 17:34 ` walt
2008-03-04 17:59 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 19:18 ` walt
2008-03-04 19:42 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-03-04 12:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 12:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 13:30 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 13:50 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 16:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:26 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-04 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:27 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-04 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 18:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-04 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:19 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 19:19 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 0:26 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-05 0:44 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:56 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-06 5:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 10:16 ` [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completion byte count Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-05 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 12:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 13:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-05 14:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-05 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-06 4:41 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-06 13:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-07 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-07 15:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-08 1:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 12:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-05 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-05 15:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 5:02 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-04 9:29 ` [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080302235223X.tomof@acm.org \
--to=tomof@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.