All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM-ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:55:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803130955.53263.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205326375.23866.215.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

On Wednesday 12 March 2008 08:52:55 am Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Only question I have is whether audit folks are ok with reuse of the
> flags in this manner

I am not going to have time to look at this until next week. I don't know how 
much help I can be since I don't actually have a system that would be running 
this new MAC framework. So, the less the audit system changes, the more 
likely it is to be OK. Lots of wild changes I can't see or test is bad.

-Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM-ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:55:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803130955.53263.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205326375.23866.215.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

On Wednesday 12 March 2008 08:52:55 am Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Only question I have is whether audit folks are ok with reuse of the
> flags in this manner

I am not going to have time to look at this until next week. I don't know how 
much help I can be since I don't actually have a system that would be running 
this new MAC framework. So, the less the audit system changes, the more 
likely it is to be OK. Lots of wild changes I can't see or test is bad.

-Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-10 12:49 [RFC][PATCH] Smack<->Audit integration Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-10 16:07 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-10 16:07   ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-10 18:26   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-10 18:26     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-10 18:43     ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12  2:44       ` [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-12  4:23         ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12 12:18           ` [PATCH -v2b] " Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-12 12:52         ` [RFC][PATCH -v2] " Stephen Smalley
2008-03-12 12:52           ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-12 15:40           ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12 15:40             ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12 15:48             ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-12 16:23               ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-12 16:43               ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-12 18:09                 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-13 13:55           ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2008-03-13 13:55             ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803130955.53263.sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darwish.07@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.